ALPHOID DNA VARIATIONS AND NON-DISJUNCTION IN DOWN’S SYNDROME: FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION AND CYTOGENETIC STUDIES
Vorsanova SG1,*, Yurov YB2, Beresheva AK1, Iourov IY2, Monakhov VV2, Sharonin VO1, Demidova IA2, Kravets VS1
*Corresponding Author: Professor Svetlana G. Vorsanova, DSc., Director, Molecular-Cytogenetic Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases, Institute of Pediatrics and Children Surgery, Russian Ministry of Health, Taldom¬skaya str 2, 127 412 Moscow, Russia; Tel.: +7-095-484-19-48; Fax: +7-095-952-89-40; E-mail: y_yurov@yahoo. com
page: 81

DISCUSSION

We have attempted to carry out a comparative study of chromosome 21 origin in DS children by molecular-cytogenetic [8] and cytogenetic [13,14] techniques. We found these approaches to be applicable in more than half (55.5%) of the families studied by FISH and 75% of fami­lies studied by the cytogenetic technique (Table 2). The combined application of FISH and cytogenetic techniques allows the detection of the origin of an additional chromo­some 21 with a high efficiency of 80.5%.

Heteromorphic regions of all human acrocentric chro­mosomes contain repetitive a-satellite DNA sequences. The existence of chromosome-specific satellite DNA se­quences and their relationship to heteromorphism of chro­mosome 21 have been demonstrated [6,8]. The variations of alphoid DNA in chromosome 21 are more extreme and could be arbitrarily classified into several discrete size classes [8]. Although, these variations are continuous, the proposed classification [8] allows semi-quantitative evalu­ation of centromeric heteromorphic alphoid DNA variants of chromosome 21.

The purpose of the present study was to verify the hypothesis that genetic variation in the alphoid DNA size on chromosome 21 is associated with a predisposition to non-disjunction. It has been hypothesized that extensive alphoid size differences between homologues of chromo­some 21 predisposed to non-disjunction [5]. The first at­tempt to identify the alphoid DNA variation in chromo­some 21 was carried out by radioactive in situ hybridiza­tion in 37 families with DS [6]. No correlation between non-disjunction and copy of alphoid DNA size was found. In the second attempt, using pulsed-field gel electrophore­sis, the chromosome 21 alphoid DNA array lengths in 23 families with an affected child with trisomy 21, were ex­amined [7]. An association between small alphoid size and maternal meiosis I was found. The evidence of the risk for non-disjunction is related to the small alphoid array size of one of the two chromosome 21 homologues. Thus, the data obtained in this field is rather contradictory.

We have attempted to find additional evidence of centromeric heteromorphic alphoid DNA variants of chro­mosome 21 correlating with non-disjunction using FISH and alphoid DNA chromosome 21-specific probes (aR1-6 specific to the a21-I array). We did not find any correla­tion between non-disjunction of chromosome 21 and al­phoid DNA variants revealed by FISH. The method we used [8] is semi-quantitative and does not allow accurate estimation of real alphoid DNA size due to restriction of the visual evaluation of FISH signal sizes. We can propose that the use of FISH in combination with quantitative computer-assisted approaches for evaluation of FISH re­sults should permit a more precise assessment of alphoid DNA variation and its possible involvement in non-dis­junction of chromosome 21.

 

Table 2. Comparative analysis of the origin of the additional chromosome 21 in 36 families with DS offspring detected by cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques.

 




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006