
ALPHOID DNA VARIATIONS AND NON-DISJUNCTION
IN DOWN’S SYNDROME: FLUORESCENCE IN SITU
HYBRIDIZATION AND CYTOGENETIC STUDIES
Vorsanova SG1,*, Yurov YB2, Beresheva AK1, Iourov IY2,
Monakhov VV2, Sharonin VO1, Demidova IA2, Kravets VS1
*Corresponding Author: Professor Svetlana G. Vorsanova, DSc., Director, Molecular-Cytogenetic Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases, Institute of Pediatrics and Children Surgery, Russian Ministry of Health, Taldom¬skaya str 2, 127 412 Moscow, Russia; Tel.: +7-095-484-19-48; Fax: +7-095-952-89-40; E-mail: y_yurov@yahoo. com page: 81
|
DISCUSSION
We have attempted to carry out a comparative study of chromosome 21 origin in DS children by molecular-cytogenetic [8] and cytogenetic [13,14] techniques. We found these approaches to be applicable in more than half (55.5%) of the families studied by FISH and 75% of families studied by the cytogenetic technique (Table 2). The combined application of FISH and cytogenetic techniques allows the detection of the origin of an additional chromosome 21 with a high efficiency of 80.5%.
Heteromorphic regions of all human acrocentric chromosomes contain repetitive a-satellite DNA sequences. The existence of chromosome-specific satellite DNA sequences and their relationship to heteromorphism of chromosome 21 have been demonstrated [6,8]. The variations of alphoid DNA in chromosome 21 are more extreme and could be arbitrarily classified into several discrete size classes [8]. Although, these variations are continuous, the proposed classification [8] allows semi-quantitative evaluation of centromeric heteromorphic alphoid DNA variants of chromosome 21.
The purpose of the present study was to verify the hypothesis that genetic variation in the alphoid DNA size on chromosome 21 is associated with a predisposition to non-disjunction. It has been hypothesized that extensive alphoid size differences between homologues of chromosome 21 predisposed to non-disjunction [5]. The first attempt to identify the alphoid DNA variation in chromosome 21 was carried out by radioactive in situ hybridization in 37 families with DS [6]. No correlation between non-disjunction and copy of alphoid DNA size was found. In the second attempt, using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, the chromosome 21 alphoid DNA array lengths in 23 families with an affected child with trisomy 21, were examined [7]. An association between small alphoid size and maternal meiosis I was found. The evidence of the risk for non-disjunction is related to the small alphoid array size of one of the two chromosome 21 homologues. Thus, the data obtained in this field is rather contradictory.
We have attempted to find additional evidence of centromeric heteromorphic alphoid DNA variants of chromosome 21 correlating with non-disjunction using FISH and alphoid DNA chromosome 21-specific probes (aR1-6 specific to the a21-I array). We did not find any correlation between non-disjunction of chromosome 21 and alphoid DNA variants revealed by FISH. The method we used [8] is semi-quantitative and does not allow accurate estimation of real alphoid DNA size due to restriction of the visual evaluation of FISH signal sizes. We can propose that the use of FISH in combination with quantitative computer-assisted approaches for evaluation of FISH results should permit a more precise assessment of alphoid DNA variation and its possible involvement in non-disjunction of chromosome 21.
Table 2. Comparative analysis of the origin of the additional chromosome 21 in 36 families with DS offspring detected by cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques.

|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|