
ALPHOID DNA VARIATIONS AND NON-DISJUNCTION
IN DOWN’S SYNDROME: FLUORESCENCE IN SITU
HYBRIDIZATION AND CYTOGENETIC STUDIES
Vorsanova SG1,*, Yurov YB2, Beresheva AK1, Iourov IY2,
Monakhov VV2, Sharonin VO1, Demidova IA2, Kravets VS1
*Corresponding Author: Professor Svetlana G. Vorsanova, DSc., Director, Molecular-Cytogenetic Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases, Institute of Pediatrics and Children Surgery, Russian Ministry of Health, Taldom¬skaya str 2, 127 412 Moscow, Russia; Tel.: +7-095-484-19-48; Fax: +7-095-952-89-40; E-mail: y_yurov@yahoo. com page: 81
|
INTRODUCTION
Down’s syndrome (DS), caused by trisomy 21, is the most commonly identified form mental retardation with a frequency of up to 1 in 600-800 births [1]. It has been estimated that the largest part of trisomy 21 fetuses are aborted during the first trimester of pregnancy (1 in 150 of all pregnancy losses) [2]. Therefore, this chromosome abnormality is considered as one of the most important genetic anomalies in humans. The results of several studies have shown that the majority of anomalies leading to trisomy 21 being due to errors in the egg, as 90% of the additional chromosome 21 is of maternal origin. About 10% are of paternal origin, and a much lower percentage of trisomy 21 is attributed to post-zygotic mitotic non-disjunction [3]. Petersen and Mikkelsen [4] report that the contribution of paternal meiotic errors leading to trisomy 21 is estimated as 5.5%, and post-zygotic mitotic non-disjunction as 3.8%. Thus, this point still remains unclear. Whereas altered recombination is accepted as an observation in non-disjunction of chromosome 21, the underlying causes and mechanisms of this phenomenon are unknown. There is a suggestion that several errors (abnormal spindle formation, premature release of sister chromatid adhesion), each having a small effect on the processes of meiosis, lead to non-disjunction, and that different processes are responsible for various non-disjunction subtypes.
It was hypothesized that extensive centromeric alphoid DNA variations between homologous chromosomes 21 can predispose to non-disjunction [5]. The first attempt to establish correlation between alphoid DNA variation and non-disjunction of chromosome 21 was performed by radioactive in situ hybridization. [6]. No relationship between non-disjunction and number of copies of alphoid DNA was found [6]. A second attempt using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to examine the chromosome 21 alphoid DNA array indicated an association between small combined alphoid size and maternal meiosis I non-disjunction [7].
In order to determine the possible association between alphoid DNA variation and non-disjunction, we have applied the FISH technique according to Verma et al. [8] in 36 families with DS offspring. Additionaly, the parental origin of chromosome 21 in DS was analyzed by FISH and cytogenetic techniques.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|