EVIDENCE FOR LARGE SCALE CHROMOSOMAL VARIATIONS IN NEURONAL CELLS OF THE FETAL HUMAN BRAIN
Yurov YB1,*, Vostrikov VS1, Monakhov VV1, Iourov IY1, Vorsanova SG2,*
*Corresponding Author: Professor Yuri B. Yurov and Professor Svetlana G. Vorsanova, Cytogenetic Labora¬tory; National Center of Mental Health, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Zagorodnoe shosse 2, Moscow 113 152, Russia; Tel.: +7-095-952-89-90; Fax: 7-095-952-89-40; E-mail: y_yurov@hotmail.com; y_yurov@ yahoo.com
page: 95

DISCUSSION

The present study indicates that the aneuploidy level was in the range of 0.2 to 15.6% for different chromo­somes in the fetal brain cells. It means that the fetal neu­ronal cells to be characterized by increased frequency of non specific aneuploidy involved different chromosomes. Usually, fetal brain nuclei have one chromosome aberra­tion, involving any individual chromosome, tested in inter­phase FISH experiments. Only limited numbers of nuclei had two or more aberrations, involving different chromo­somes simultaneously. Approximately 95% neuronal cells could be considered as karyotypically normal, when we analyzed only one chromosome-specific DNA probe. However, mFISH analysis of several chromosomes in one FISH experiment, and application of a probe set for six different chromosomes, strongly indicated that the total number of chromosomally abnormal neuronal cells could be very high. For examples, we could estimate the total (cumulative) number of aberrant nuclei for six different chromosomes (1, 13/21, 18, X, Y) as 22%. We could propose that the number of aneuploidies in the fetal human brain cells, involving all 23 chromosome pairs, should be substantially higher. Therefore, our data strongly indicates that large-scale genomic (chromosomal) variations due to chromosomal complement instability in developing neu­ronal cells could take place and, therefore, this phenome­non can have a substantial effect on brain development.

There are no molecular-cytogenetic studies applying interphase FISH for the studies of the fetal human brain. Only the study of a model genetic object (mice) is avail­able at the present time. Direct FISH and spectral karyo­type analysis of neurons in the developing and adult ner­vous system of mouse embryonic cerebral cortical neuro­blast have been performed [2]. These approaches identify more than 30% of neuroblasts to be aneuploid. Therefore, it is possible that genomes in developing and adult mam­malian neurons can be different at the level of whole chro­mosomes.

There is only one indication, published in abstract form [6], that the fetal human brain could contain a large proportion of chromosomally abnormal cells. The results of the present study are in agreement with those data.

There are only limited numbers of molecular-cyto­genetic studies, utilizing interphase FISH for the studies of the adult human brain [12,13]. The use of the one-color FISH technique to examine the chromosomal complement of interphase nuclei in the adult human brain have demon­strated that a significant fraction of the hyppocampal py­ramidal and basal forebrain neurons in Alzheimer’s dis­ease have a fully of partially tetraploid chromosome com­plement. Yang et al. [12] propose that this imbalance in chromosome complement is the direct cause of neuronal loss in Alzheimer’s disease. A molecular-cytogenetic study, utilizing mFISH of post-mortem brain of schizo­phrenic patients, has been recently performed [13]. A statistically significant level of aneuploidy (up to 4% of neurons) was detected in the postmortem brain (prefrontal cortex, Brodmann’s area 10) of patients with schizophre­nia. The result indicated that a low-level of aneuploidy (or chromosomal mosaicism) could be involved in the patho­genesis of schizophrenia. Therefore, neuropsychiatric diseases might have a special interest for extended molecular-cytogenetic analysis as they could be associated with chromosomal and gene mutations involving in regula­tion of neuro developmental processes in the brain. It was proposed recently that the central nervous system, both during development and in adulthood, has genetic mosaic features: an euploid population intermixed with a smaller but genetically diverse aneuploid population. Such mosa­icism may have relevance to a variety of fields including stem cell biology, mammalian cloning, genomics, neuro­genetics and neuropsychiatric diseases. At the organism level, these permanent genomic changes might contribute to physiological and behavioral variations among individ­uals not accounted for by classical genetics. Therefore, even extremely low percentages of mosaic forms of aneu­ploidies really exist in the fetal and adult human brain; the presence of abnormal neuronal cells could significantly affect normal brain development and functions.

Nevertheless, the actual amount of chromosomally abnormal neuronal cells in the human brain is unknown. Taking into account the data that large-scale genomic variations due to chromosomal complement instability in developing neuronal cells are present and could have sub­stantial effect on normal brain development and functions, direct studies of chromosomal complements in the fetal and human brain should be continued.

 

 

Table 1. The results of aneuploidy analysis in fetal brain samples (FBS) for chromosomes 1, 13/21, 18, X and Y (%).

 




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006