QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENT POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (QFPCR) IN THE PRENATAL AND POSTNATAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE MOST FREQUENT ANEUPLOIDIES
Macek M Sr1,*, Krebsova A1,2, Brou_ková M1, Matj_ková M1, Machatková M1, Diblík J1, Sperling K2, Vorsanova S3, Kutsev S4, Zerova S5, Arbuzova S6, Chudoba D1, Novotná D1
*Corresponding Author: Associate Professor Milan Macek, Sr., MD, PhD, Centre of Reproductive Genetics, Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, 2nd Medical School, V uvalu 84, Prague, CZ 150 06, Czech Republic; Tel.: +4202-2443-3534; Fax: +4202-2443-3525; E-mail: pavel.roubic@lfmotol.cuni.cz
page: 87

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QFPCR) represents a rapid and reliable molecular ge­netic method for the detection of the most frequent aneuploidies of the chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y in prenatal diagnosis that does not require long-term cultiva­tion of fetal cells necessary for classical cytogenetic anal­ysis. Its feasibility was confirmed on amniocytes from genetic amniocentesis [1-8], on chorionic villi samples (CVS) [9], on coelomic cells [10], on fetal cells from cer­vical/uterine lavages [11-13], and on fetal cells or fetal DNA in maternal blood [14]. This method is also feasible on single cell level in pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) [3,15,16].

Quantitative fluorescent PCR uses multiplex PC reac­tions of specific STRs from different regions of the studied chromosomes [17] and fluorochrome labeling of specific STR primers [18,19]. It is based on the pioneering works of von Eggeling et al. [20], Mansfield [21] and Mutter and Pomponio [22]. New, highly polymorphic micro­satellite markers provide the highest genetic informativity for the detection of heterochromosomal and autosomal aneuploidies [23-25]. Rahil et al.[26] recently introduced non polymorphic target genes on chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 for QFPCR aneuploidy detection, and Pont-Kingdon and Lyon (27) for allele quantification combined with melting curves analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism loci. Quantitative fluorescent PCR also assures exact diag­nosis of partial chromosome aneuploidies [28,29] in prena­tal diagnosis, as well as in solid tumors in children with the detection of loss of heterozygosity.

The amnio PCR minimizes parental anxiety by aneu­ploidy detection in genetic risk pregnancies with abnormal results of ultrasound and biochemical screening in the first and second trimesters [30-33] with a 99% reliability. Moreover, QFPCR provides easy and reliable detection of parental and meiotic origin of aneuploidies for genetic counseling, as well as for the study of the impact of ge­netic and exogenous factors on the pathogenesis of non-disjunction [1,34,35].The aim of our report is to summa­rize the implementation of QFPCR in prenatal and post­natal diagnosis of aneuploidies.

 

Table 1(a). Applied STR markers. (bp denotes the length in base pairs; repeat describes the number of bases in a tandem repeat of a particular STR; AMX/Y: the repeat field is empty because this marker is not an STR; markers in italics represent new STR markers for chromosomes 13, 18 and 21, introduced and verified in our study.)

 

 

 

Table 1(b). STR markers used for heterochromosome evaluation. (Markers in italics represent new STR markers, introduced and verified in our study, that allow quantification of chromosome X aneuploidies and increase the proportion of genetic informative families.)

 

 

 

 




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006