
ULTRASONOGRAPHIC MARKERS IN
CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES
Sifakis S* *Corresponding Author: Stavros Sifakis, MD, 228 Oulaf Palme Street, 71410 Heraklion, Crete, Greece; Tel.: +302810392609; Fax: +302810212915; E-mail: sifakis@excite.com page: 31
|
CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES
Down’s Syndrome (trisomy 21). The risk for trisomy 21 increases with maternal age and decreases with the stage of gestation. The rate of intrauterine lethality between 12 and 40 weeks is about 30% [1]. Thus, a first trimester screening test is expected to show an improved performance over later tests, since the relative proportion of fetuses with trisomy 21 is higher in the first trimester than it is in the second trimester. First and second trimester maternal serum biochemistry, the NT measurement at the 11-13 weeks’ gestation, as well as genetic sonography in the second trimester, have been proposed by various investigators as a means of adjusting the risk for DS, and therefore the need for invasive procedures for fetal karyotyping [2-6].
A thickened nuchal fold was the first described sonographic sign of DS in 1985 by Benacerraf et al. [7]. From then on, many sonographically identified markers associated with DS, have been described [2,8-11]. They include short femur, short humerus, increased nuchal fold thickening, pyelectasis, echogenic bowel, choroids plexus cysts, hypoplastic middle phalanx of the fifth digit, wide space between the first and second toes (sandal gap), a two-vessel umbilical cord and many others which are presented in Table 1. Most fetuses with trisomy 21 will have more than one ultrasound marker present [2,8-10]. Moreover, the presence of multiple ultrasound markers is the rule rather than the exception in fetuses with trisomy 21. Thus, the question arises as to which markers are the most diagnostically efficient.
Trisomy 18. Also called the Edward syndrome, has an incidence of 3/1,000 births [12]. It is associated with severe growth restriction and multiple structural malformations that involve practically all organs [13-15] (Table 1). By sonography, about 80-85% of fetuses with trisomy 18 are detected prenatally [15]. Major cardiac abnormalities are present in more than 90% of the affected fetuses [12]. The detection of trisomy 18 by ultrasonography improves with gestational age, as severe growth restriction and polyhydramnios become apparent. The majority of fetuses with trisomy 18 die in utero, probably because of placental insufficiency; those that survive until birth, die within a few hours, days or weeks after delivery.
Trisomy 13. This autosomal trisomy (also called Patau syndrome) has an incidence of 1/5,000 births [12]. The newborns die shortly, within days or weeks after delivery. The associated sonographic abnormalities (Table 1) are obvious and severe, and most of them are detectable early in the second trimester. Throughout pregnancy, 90-100% of cases are sonographically detectable [13,16]. Almost all the systems are involved, mainly the central nervous system (holoprosencephaly, midline facial, and neural tube defects), the heart (defects in more than 90% of the fetuses), the kidneys (polycystic kidneys in 30% of cases) [13,16,17]. A differential diagnosis with Meckel-Gruber syndrome is sometimes needed because of the same pattern of abnormalities. This lethal autosomal recessive condition has a risk of recurrence of 25% in the same family.
Triploidy. This is the result of three complete sets of chromosomes. In most cases, the extra set of chromosomes is paternally derived. The vast majority of triploidy conceptions are lost early in gestation, if however, there is a double maternal chromosome contribution, the pregnancy may persist into the third trimester [1,12]. In ultrasonography, these fetuses have multiple severe malformations, and severe asymmetrical restriction of early onset [18]. In 60-90% of cases, the placenta initially appears to be of a normal consistency, but progressively becomes large, hydropic-appearing, which is consistent with partial moles. This occurs when the third set of chromosomes is paternal in origin [12]. When the excess set of chromosomes is maternally derived, the placenta is small and associated with oligohydramnios. The most common sonographic features are summarized in Table 1. In triploidy, as in trisomy 18, the correct antenatal diagnosis is very important, since the affected fetuses may be mistaken for normal fetuses with growth restriction and placental insufficiency, which would stimulate aggressive management such as operative delivery, with no benefit since the outcome is extremely poor.
Turner Syndrome. The non lethal type usually does not demonstrate any ultrasonographic abnormalities. In the lethal type, intrauterine lethality between 12-40 weeks occurs in 75% of the fetuses [1].These fetuses present in the sonogram with large nuchal cystic hygromata, generalized edema, mild pleural effusions and ascites, and cardiac abnormalities (Table 1).
Sex Chromosome Abnormalities. Sex chromosome abnormalities other than Turner syndrome, include the 47,XXX, 47,XXY, and 47,XYY. They are not associated with an increased prevalence of sonographically detectable defects [1].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|