
EVALUATION OF METHYLATION PROFILES OF AN
EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR GENE
IN A HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL
CARCINOMA PATIENT GROUP Mutlu M, Mutlu P, Azarkan S, Bayır O, Ocal B, Saylam G, Korkmaz MH *Corresponding Author: Associate Professor Murad Mutlu, M.D., Department of Otorhinolaringology,
Health Sciences University, Ministry of Health, Dışkapı Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hopsital,
Sehit Ömer Halisdemir Street, No. 20, 06110, Dışkapı, Ankara, Turkey. Tel.: +90-312-516-2000.
Fax: +90-312-318-6690. E-mail: muradmutlu78@yahoo.com page: 65
|
RESULTS
Clinicopathological Parameters of Control and
Patient Groups. Control group were selected to match
the patients in terms of demographic data including age
and gender. The median ages of control and patient groups
were 58 and 59, respectively. On the other hand, 13.0% of
the patients were female and 87.0% were male, whereas
25.0% of the healthy individuals were female and 75.0%
were male. The most common tumor originated on the
larynx (65.96%), followed by hypopharynx (10.64%)
among the HNSCC patient group in our study. According
to pathological staging, 21.27% patients were reported as
being in T1, 21.27% in T2, 42.55% in T3 and 14.89% in
T4 stages (Table 1).
Methylation Profile. Promoter methylation of the
EGFR gene was detected by MS-PCR following bisulfite
modification of DNAs (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Cycle
threshold values obtained from both healthy individuals
and patients were compared with the Ct values of control
DNA, and the methylation profiles were determined for
each individual. If the methylated reaction is positive and
the unmethylated reaction is negative or both reactions are positive, the methylation status is evaluated as methylated.
On the other hand, if the methylated reaction is negative
and the unmethylated reaction is positive, methylation
status is determined as unmethylated. Samples with negative
reaction of both methylated and unmethylated were
excluded from the study (Table 3 and Table 4).
According to the MS-PCR results, methylation was
observed in 79.0% of patients, whereas methylation was
not observed in 21.0% of patients. On the other hand, in the control group, methylation was observed in 90.0%
healthy individuals (Table 5).
The methylation profile of the EGFR gene promoter
was also compared with age, gender, and clinicopathological
characteristics in the control and patient groups (Table 6).
There is no statistically significant difference in terms of
age, gender and clinicopathological characteristics.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|