
ARRAY-COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION
RESULTS IN CLINICALLY AFFECTED CASES
WITH APPARENTLY BALANCED CHROMOSOMAL
REARRANGEMENTS Satkin NB, Karaman B, Ergin S, Kayserili H, Kalelioglu IH, Has R, Yuksel A, Basaran S *Corresponding Author: Nihan B. Satkin, Ph.D., Department of Medical Genetics, Istanbul University
Faculty of Medicine, Millete Street, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel.: +90-536-561-0313.
Fax: +90-212-414-2000. E-mail: bilgenihan@gmail.com page: 25
|
INTRODUCTION
Balanced chromosomal rearrangements comprising
translocations or inversions with an incidence 0.52% in the
general population are structural chromosomal rearrangements
without cytogenetically detected imbalances [1]. As
conventional karyotyping might not be able to detect the
smaller than 5-10 Mb imbalances, some submicroscopic
imbalances can be overlooked [2]. These types of rearrangements
are called as apparently balanced chromosomal
rearrangements (ABCRs) and can be familial or de novo in
origin. Warburton [3] determined the risk of phenotypical
abnormalities as 6.1% for de novo ABCR translocations
and inversions in a large prenatal series. Madan et al. [4]
estimated the risk as 23.0% for complex chromosome rearrangements
(CCRs), defining structural rearrangements involving
more than two breakpoints. Especially, if the ABCR
is de novo, it is important to search the submicroscopic
genomic imbalances. Not only the cryptic imbalances could
affect the phenotype but also other mechanisms, such as
impairment of the expression of the gene in its new location
(positional effects), disruption of genes at the breakpoints,
formation of a new chimeric gene and disruption of the
parental imprinting pattern might have a role [5].
The application of chromosomal microarray (CMA)
has become an essential tool in routine diagnostics to detect the submicroscopic genomic imbalances for genome-wide
screening at kilobase (kb) levels. Chromosomal microarray
contributes a 15.0-20.0% detection rate of cryptic chromosomal
imbalance in selected patients who have multiple
congenital anomalies/intellectual disability (MCA/ID)
with normal karyotypes [6,7].
We report here the CMA results of the 34 clinically
affected patients (13 prenatal, 21 postnatal) carrying de
novo or familial ABCRs of a single center in Turkey. The
aim of the study was to add new cases to the literature, to
present the rate of submicroscopic genomic imbalances
according to different type of chromosomal abnormalities
such as translocations, inversions, and CCRs, which are
important in genetic counseling, and these findings were
combined with published studies to provide the newest
integrated insights.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|