
ARRAY-COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION
RESULTS IN CLINICALLY AFFECTED CASES
WITH APPARENTLY BALANCED CHROMOSOMAL
REARRANGEMENTS Satkin NB, Karaman B, Ergin S, Kayserili H, Kalelioglu IH, Has R, Yuksel A, Basaran S *Corresponding Author: Nihan B. Satkin, Ph.D., Department of Medical Genetics, Istanbul University
Faculty of Medicine, Millete Street, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel.: +90-536-561-0313.
Fax: +90-212-414-2000. E-mail: bilgenihan@gmail.com page: 25 download article in pdf format
|
Abstract
Carriers of apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements
(ABCRs) have a 2-3-fold higher risk of
carrying an abnormal phenotype, when compared to the
average population. Apparently balanced chromosomal
rearrangements can be imbalanced at the submicroscopic
level, and changes in the gene structure, formation of a new
chimeric gene, gain or loss of function of the genes and
altered imprinting pattern may also affect the phenotype.
Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is an efficient tool to
detect submicroscopic imbalances at the breakpoints as
well as in the whole genome. We aimed to determine the
effectiveness of array-comparative genomic hybridization
(aCGH) application in phenotypically affected cases with
ABCRs at a single center from Turkey. Thirty-four affected
cases (13 prenatal, 21 postnatal) carrying ABCRs were
investigated with CMA. In postnatal series, ABCRs were
familial in 7 and de novo in 14 cases. Seven de novo cases
were imbalanced (in postnatal series 33.3% and in de novo
cases 50.0%). Out of 13 prenatal cases, five were familial
and eight were de novo in origin and two de novo cases
were imbalanced (in 15.4% prenatal series and in 25.0%
de novo cases). No cryptic imbalance was observed in
familial cases. The anomaly rates with array studies ranged
between 14.3-25.0% in familial and between 20.0-57.5%
in de novo cases of postnatal series in the literature. Studies
focused on prenatal ABCR cases with abnormal ultrasound
findings are limited and no submicroscopic imbalance was
reported in the cohorts. When de novo postnatal or prenatal
results were combined, the percentage of abnormalities
detected by CMA was 40.9%. Taking this contribution into
consideration, all ABCRs should be investigated by CMA
even if the fetal ultrasound findings are normal.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|