
DETOXIFICATION GENE POLYMORPHISMS AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO
SPORADIC MOTOR NEURON DISEASE IN THE RUSSIAN POPULATION
Shadrina MI1,*, Slominsky PA1, Zherebtsova AL1, Levitsky GN2, Levitskaya NI2,
Alekhin AV2, Semenova EV1, Serdyuk AV2, Skvortsova VL2, Limborska SA1
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Maria I. Shadrina - Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Scences, Kurchatov sq.2, Moscow 123 182, Russia; Tel.: +7-095-196-0210; Fax: +7-095-196-0221; E-mail: shadrina@ img.ras.ru page: 31
|
INTRODUCTION
Motor neuron disease (MND) is a late-onset neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of motor cells of the brain and spinal cord [1]. Epidemiological studies indicate a 5-10% incidence of familial MND. The clinical and pathological features of familial and sporadic MND are virtually identical.
Motor neuron disease is a multifactorial disease that involves complex interactions between genes and environmental factors [2]. Despite years of research, the genetic basis of MND remains to be fully elucidated. A significant etiological factor may be oxygen free radicals which, at high concentrations, damage neuronal cells [3]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) [4] is important in maintaining normal levels of oxygen free radicals. Mutations in the CuZn-SOD gene (SOD1) have been found in 20% of familial MND patients, and at a lower frequency, in apparently sporadic MND cases [5,6]. We have reported on two mutations in MND patients from Russia [7].
Detoxification processes might produce free radicals which can become transformed into nontoxic products. These processes play a key role in metabolism of xenobiotics, including most therapeutic drugs and environmental pollutants [8], many of which may be involved in the degeneration of neuronal cells. Detoxification of xenobiotics included their activation during phase I and deactivation of highly toxic intermediate metabolic products during phase II. The cytochrome P-450 (CYP) (phase I) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) supergene families and arylamine N-acetyltransferase type 2 (NAT2) (phase II) play major roles in these biotransformation processes.
The CYPs are responsible for the oxidative, peroxidative and reductive metabolism of endogenous and exogenous compounds. Alterations in CYP activity can render individuals susceptible to the actions of endogenous and of exogenous environmental toxins. CYP2E1, CYP2D6, CYP2A1, and CYP1A2, may be involved in pathogenesis of neurological diseases [9-11].
The CYP2E1 (an ethanol-inducible cytochrome) catalyzes the oxidation of more than 75 xenobiotic substrates and has the unique ability to activate many xenobiotic compounds into toxic metabolites that often free radicals and have been proposed to underlie pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [3]. Recently, a 96 bp insertion polymorphism (CYP2E1*1D) in the CYP2E1 promoter was localized to a region between –2270 and –1672. Genotypes containing the insertion are associated with higher levels of induced enzyme activity than is the wild type [12]. This increase probably elevate the formation of reactive oxygen species and of neurotoxic metabolites. We assume that this polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of MND.
Debrisoquine 4-hydroxylase (CYP2D6) involved in the metabolism of a wide range of xenobiotics. Approximately 5-10% of Caucasians are deficient in this enzyme activity [“poor metabolizer” (PM) phenotype] [13]. This phenotype has been associated with various diseases, including Parkinson’s disease [14] and Alzheimer’s disease [15]. Of at least 30 different defective CYP2D6 alleles, six contribute to 95-99% of PM phenotypes [13]. The well-characterized variant CYP2D6*4 results from a G→A substitution at the intron 3/ exon 4 junction. Homozygosity for CYP2D6*4 is genetically responsible for about 75% of PM phenotypes [16]. In one study, the frequency of CYP2D6*4 homozygotes among ALS patients did not differ from that of the control group [17]. In another study, there was a significant increase in the frequency of the CYP2D6*4 allele in the ALS patient group. This suggests that the CYP2D6*4 allele may be a risk factor for the development of ALS [10].
Phase I detoxification metabolites are often potentially more harmful than the original compounds, and it is important that they do not accumulate. Phase II enzymes catalyze binding of intermediary metabolites and their transformation into hydrophilic excretable products. Thus, the GSTs mediate the conjugation of many electrophilic compounds with reduced glutathione (GSH) [18]. At least seven families of human soluble GST have been identified in humans: α, µ, π, δ, θ, κ , and ζ [19]; θ1 (GSTT1), µ1 (GSTM1) and π1 (GSTP1) are of greatest interest here. Deletion variants or null alleles of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes fail to express a product. Homozygozity for null alleles of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes are common, occurring in 10-20% and 40-65% of the Caucasian population, respectively [20]. The GSTP1 gene has several polymorphisms. The exon 5 A→G transition resulting in the Ile→Val substitution at codon 105, confers altered heat stability and specific activity of GSTP1 [21]. These variants are thought to increase susceptibility to chronic bronchitis, arteriosclerosis, various types of cancer [22], and neurological diseases [23].
The NAT2 catalyze the N-acetylation of xenobiotics with a primary aromatic amine or a hydrazine structure (such as the toxic nitrosamines in tobacco smoke, antioxidants, and pesticides). It is also implicated in drug metabolism, including drug-drug interactions [24]. The population is divided in two main groups according to variation in NAT2 activity: slow acetylators (SA) and rapid acetylators (RA). The SA are homozygous for two recessive “slow” alleles and produce <20% on NAT2 activity compared to the wild type gene. The RA have at least one wild-type “fast” allele [25]. Many studies have demonstrated the influence of this acetylation polymorphism on the development of various diseases, including several types of cancer [26] and neurological diseases such as Parkinson’s disease [27].
These data, and the fact that patients with chronic neurological dysfunction, appear to have a reduced capacity to detoxify certain environmental compounds [28], suggest that genes of the detoxification system may be involved in MND pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis. We carried out a comparative analysis of the distributions of various genotypes of the CYP2E1, CYP2D6, GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and NAT2 genes in MND patients and control subjects.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|