
COMPARISON OF K-RAS MUTATIONS IN LUNG TUMOR
AND TUMOR-ADJACENT HISTOLOGICALLY-NORMAL
LUNG TISSUES OF PATIENTS WITH LUNG CANCER
Keohavong P1,5, Mady HH2,6, Gao WM1, Siegfried JM3,5, Luketich JD4,5,
Melhem MF2,6
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Phouthone Keohavong, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, 3343 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; Tel: +412-383-2087; Fax: +412-383-2123; E-mail: pho1@pitt.edu page: 3
|
DISCUSSION
Although K-ras mutations are implicated in the development of lung cancer, the timing of these mutations in lung carcinogenesis is not understood. Particularly, there have been conflicting reports on whether or not K-ras mutations are present in non-neoplastic or normal-appearing lung tissues obtained from lung cancer patients, which, in the affirmative, would indicate that these mutations rather represent early events in lung carcinogenesis.
The results of our studies demonstrated that K-ras mutations were present in histologically normal tissue surrounding lung tumor [34,35]. They also demonstrated that a genotypically identical K-ras mutation was present in both the histologically normal tissue and matched lung tumor tissue in some cases of lung cancer. In addition, in one case, two mutations were present in the histologically normal tissue but only one mutation was present in the matched tumor and was genotypically identical to one of the mutations found in the normal tissue (see the GGT® AGT mutation in case 4, Table 1).
The K-ras mutation has been reported in non-neoplastic tissues in colorectal and pancreatic cancer. Using sensitive methods, K-ras mutations were detected in histologically normal mucosal tissues adjacent to or distant from colorectal carcinoma [36-38]. K-ras mutations have also been suggested to be preneoplastic events in pancreatic cancer [39-43]. However, in lung cancer, there have been conflicting reports on K-ras mutations in non-neoplastic tissues. Santos et al. [44] investigated a K-ras codon 12 mutation in lung tissues obtained from a patient with squamous cell lung carcinoma and reported that the mutation detected in lung carcinoma was absent from the normal bronchial and parenchymal tissues of that patient, suggesting that malignant activation of K-ras oncogene may be specifically associated with the development of a human neoplasm. Sugio et al. [22] reported that K-ras mutations were infrequent in dysplastic lesions and absent from metaplasia and normal-appearing cells of the lung, suggesting that these mutations are relatively late events in the pathogenesis of lung cancer.
In agreement with the results reported by both Santos et al. [44] and Sugio et al. [22], Urban et al. [45] did not detect K-ras mutations in non-neoplastic peripheral bronchial or parenchymal tissues associated with lung tumors. Finally, in another study by Yakubovskaya et al. [30], K-ras mutations were detected by a sensitive method in up to 60% of samples from normal-appearing lung tissues, 62% of samples from tumor tissues, and 80% of metastasis, obtained from patients with NSCLC. However, the fact that these mutations were present at a very low fraction in these samples suggest that they did not contribute to the development of lung cancer. These results did not agree with those reported in a few other studies. For instance, Westra et al. [23] showed that K-ras mutations were identified in atypical alveolar hyperplasia, a potential precursor from which lung adenocarcinoma arises. In another study of bioptric bronchoscopy specimens from lung cancer patients, Clements et al. [46] showed that, in five of 22 patients, K-ras mutations were found in both malignant and nonmalignant tissues, while in two patients, mutations were found only in the nonmalignant tissue. Our previous study showed that K-ras mutations were detected in both tumor tissue and tumor-adjacent normal-appearing lung tissues in four of eight K-ras mutation-positive cases of lung adenocarcinoma [34]. A recent study by Urban et al. [47] showed that K-ras mutations were detected both in lung tumor and bronchial carina in four of 19 patients (21%) and also only in the bronchial carina but not in the tumor in two of 19 patients (11%). Together, these studies and our study of cells sampled by laser capture microdissection showed that K-ras mutations are present in non-neoplastic lung tissues, including histologically normal tissues, suggesting that these mutations may occur early during the development of lung cancer in some patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The significance of the presence of K-ras mutations in histologically normal lung tissues remains poorly understood. Lung cancer is a well-established example of the association between environmental exposure, chiefly to tobacco smoke, and human cancer. In field carcinogenesis, alterations in oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes are assumed to occur in tobacco carcinogen-exposed cells long before observable cellular histopathological changes. Therefore, it implies that oncogene alterations should be detected not only in malignant cells but also in non-neoplastic cells, including histologically normal cells [48,49]. In our study, four of 38 lung adenocarcinoma showed K-ras mutations in the tumor-surrounding histologically normal tissues. All but four patients were smokers. Altogether, the results of current studies show that the significance of K-ras mutations both in lung carcinogenesis and as predictive markers for lung cancer needs to be further elucidated. The molecular approach described herein should be applicable to compare mutations in histologically normal tissue and lung tumor tissue in a larger number of samples from smoking, ex-smoking and nonsmoking lung cancer patients, in order to elucidate the significance of K-ras mutations, both in lung carcinogenesis and as a marker of exposure to tobacco smoke carcinogens in patients at risk for developing lung adenocarcinoma.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|