PRIMED IN SITU AND PEPTIDE NUCLEIC ACID: TWO FAST AND EFFICIENT TECHNIQUES FOR IN SITU CHROMOSOMAL DETECTION
Pellestor F*
*Corresponding Author: : Dr. Franck Pellestor, Institut de Genétique Humaine, CNRS UPR 1142, 141 rue de la Cardonille, F-34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; Tel.: +33-(0)4-99-61-99-12; Fax: +33-(0)4-99-61-99-01; E-mail: Franck.Pellestor@igh.cnrs.fr
page: 61

THE PNA TECHNIQUE

Definition and Properties. Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) constitute a new class of DNA probes, that pro­vide an interesting alternative to FISH and PRINS. The PNAs are synthetic mimics of DNA in which the deoxy­ribose phosphate backbone supporting the nucleic acid bases, is replaced by a non-charged peptide backbone [Fig. 2(A)]. The unique chemical makeup of these probes confer a number of beneficial properties, including en­hanced hybridization rates, resistance to nucleases and proteases, and the ability to penetrate condensed biologi­cal structures. The neutral backbone of PNA provides strong binding between PNA/DNA or PNA/RNA strands and greater specificity of interaction than their DNA coun­terparts. While they hybridize according to normal Watson-Crick base pairing rules, PNAs have been shown to bind to DNA or RNA targets with higher affinity than the corresponding oligonucleotides. Unlike DNA probes, that require high salt concentration to bind, PNA probes can bind to DNA or RNA under low ionic strength condi­tions that disfavor re-annealing of complementary strands. Experiments with homopyrimidine strands have shown that the Tm of a 6 mer PNAT/DNAdA was 31°C in compari­son to a DNAdt/DNAdA 6-mer duplex that denatures at a temperature of less than 10°C. Experiments done with PNA probes containing all four bases have demonstrated that there is an increase of the Tm of about 1°C per base pair in PNA hybrids compared to DNA/DNA or RNA/ RNA duplexes. In addition, a PNA/DNA mismatch is more destabilizing than a mismatch in a DNA/DNA du­plex. A single mismatch in mixed PNA/DNA 15-mer de­creases the Tm by 15°C. In the corresponding DNA/DNA duplex, a single mismatch decreases the Tm by only 11°C. Moreover, the use of even shorter PNA probes can further increase PNA specificity. This advantage is particularly important for hybridization with short probes targeting repetitive sequences, because both the length and the re­petitive nature of these genomic targets will favor re-naturation over hybridization with probes.

These outlined properties mean that it is not necessary to design long PNA probes. Short PNA oligomers, from17 to 22 bases units, constitute efficient tools for detecting specific DNA sequences with fast hybridization kinetics (20 to 60 min.) over a wide pH range. In addition, PNAs are not limited to any detection procedure. The PNAs can be labeled with a large variety of reporter molecules (en­zymes, haptens, fluorophores) [Fig. 2(B)].

Applications and Perspectives. The PNA was origi­nally conceived as reagents for sequence-specific recogni­tion of double-stranded DNA via triple helix formation [26]. However, the unique properties of PNA as a DNA mimic have quickly led to the development of various applications. Most notably, PNAs find current use in mo­lecular biological techniques as specific and sensitive probes for complementary nucleic acids. The PNA oligo­mers are powerful probes in Southern and Northern blot­ting but also for mutation research. Polymerization of PNA oligomers into polyacrylamide gels creates a me­dium in which the unique properties of PNA/DNA interac­tions are utilized to achieve hybridization with single-stranded target DNA during affinity electrophoresis. Such a procedure has been used to identify single point muta­tions [27]. However, the greatest benefit of PNA comes from the development of new diagnostic assays. For exam­ple, PNA technology drastically reduces assay times com­pared to standard methods for bacterial analysis, by using PNA probes that target specific ribosomial RNA sequences [28]. Because of their high affinity and stabil­ity, PNA oligomers are also employed in transcription inhibition (antigene strategy) and translation inhibition (antisens strategy) [29]. The use of PNA probes in cyto­genetics, as an efficient variation to FISH for chromo­somal identification, is recent. Firstly, it has been demon­strated that PNA probes are useful for detecting telomere repeat sequences [30] and triplet repeat sequences in myo­tonic dystrophy cells [31]. The high discriminating ability of PNA probes was evidenced by the detection of inter-spaced centromeric DNA repeats that differed by a single base pair [32], suggesting the further use of PNAs for differentiating chromosomal polymorphisms. The avail­ability of chromosome-specific centomeric PNA probes, directly fluorochrome-labeled, has led to the development of rapid PNA protocols for the in situ detection and enu­meration of human chromosomes in metaphases and inter­phase nuclei. Multicolor PNA experiments were thus re­ported on cells from normal subjects and patients with numerical abnormalities [33,34]. The procedure was also adapted on human sperm [35]. On this material, PNA gave a similar performance to PRINS, pointing out the advan­tages of both these techniques over conventional FISH in terms of hybridization kinetics, specificity and accessibil­ity to the targeted sequences. The successful adaptation of the PNA technique on human sperm has proven that these probes could be used on difficult and compact biological material.


The fast hybridization, penetration and discrimination of PNA probes make them valuable tools for in situ chro­mosomal screening. They have great potential for clinical applications, in particular when chromosomal identifica­tion must be performed on limited amounts of material, and in a limited time period such as in pre-implantation chromosomal diagnosis.

 

Figure 2. Peptide nucleic acid labeling. (A) Comparison of PNA and DNA structures. Whereas the DNA involves a phosphate backbone supporting the nucleic acid bases, the PNA backbone is made from repeating N-(2-aminoethyl)-glycine units linked by peptide bonds. The acid nucleic bases are linked to the backbone by methylene carbonyl linkages. (B) Example of PNA labeling on human lymphocytes, using specific-centromeric PNA probes for chromosome 1 (blue signal), chromosome X (red signal) and chromosome Y (green signal).

 




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006