
PRE-IMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS
USING POLAR BODIES
Tomi D1,*, Voigt R1, Eckhold J1, Hinrichs F1, Griesinger G2,
Shulze-Mosgau A2, Schöpper B2, Al-Hasani S2, Diedrich K2, Schwinger E1
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Diana Tomi, Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University of Lübeck, Ratze¬burger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany; Tel.: +49(0)451-500-2621; Fax: +49(0)451-500-4187; E-mail: dianatomi@hotmail.com page: 17
|
INTRODUCTION
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) offers high-risk couples for genetic diseases in their offspring the option of detecting these diseases before implantation of the embryos. By analyzing the polar bodies (PBs) manipulation of the embryo itself is avoided [1].
This is also the only possibility of performing PGD in Germany due to the “Embryo Protection Law” (Embryonenschutzgesetz) [2,3]. Termination of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis is accepted and practised in Germany. However, some couples refuse pregnancy interruption so that PB diagnosis is considered as an alternative. The limitation of PB diagnosis is that one can only test one cell and analyze only the maternal genome.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common severe autosomal recessive disease in the Caucasian population, affecting about 1 in 2,500 newborns. The most predominant defect, accounting for 70-75% of all CF mutations in North Europe, is a 3 bp deletion at amino acid position 508 (DF508). At the present time, more than 900 different mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) have been reported. To make pre-implantation diagnosis reliable for affected couples and compatible with the restrictions by the German law, we established a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for PB testing.
Chromosomal aneuploidy is the most frequent cause for loss of pregnancies [4]. Early pregnancy losses, without the possibility of analyzing the embryonal karyotype, may also be caused, to a considerable degree, by aneuploidy. By fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using specific fluorochrome-labelled DNA probes for different chromosomes, it is possible to evaluate the number of the marked chromosomes in interphase cells. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was used for the first time to detect sex chromosomes in human blastomeres [5]. This technique was expanded to detect aneuploidies for three or more chromosomes in blastomeres and also in PBs [6,7]. We present our first data after first PB diagnosis for aneuploidies of chromosomes 15, 16 and 22.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|