THE PREVALENCE OF Y CHROMOSOME MICRO- DELETIONS AMONG INFERTILE MALES FROM THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
Plaseski T1,2, Dimitrovski C2, Kocevska B2, Efremov GD1, Plaseska-Karanfilska D1*
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Av. Krste Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3235-410 Fax: +389-2-3115-434; E-mail: dijana@manu.edu.mk
page: 39

DISCUSSION

The overall prevalence of micro-deletions among nearly 5,000 infertile men, published in the literature, is 8% [7]. However, the incidence of Y micro-deletions in infertile men varies greatly between studies, from 1% [4] to 55% [5]. This variability can be explained by factors related to: 1) study design (inclusion criteria, clinical definition of patients); 2) lack of rigorous testing of nega­tive results (false deletions); and 3) ethnic and geographic differences of the studied populations. A recent review article comparing four different populations studied by a similar set of primers and using homogenous criteria for definition of idiopathic infertility, has shown that the main factor influencing deletion frequency is the composition of the study population, while ethnic or geographical differ­ences have no influence [14]. Micro-deletions were found almost exclusively in infertile men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia (sperm concentrations of <5 x 106/mL). Deletions are extremely rare in men with a sperm concentration of >5 x 106/mL [6,7].

Among the 109 infertile male patients studied we have detected a total of seven micro-deletions. Six of the patients with deletions were affected with azoospermia, while one was diagnosed as severely oligozoospermic. Thus, the overall frequency of Y chromosome micro-dele­tions among infertile males from the Republic of Macedo­nia is 6.4%. (16.7% among men with azoospermia, 2.8% among men with oligozoospermia <5 x 106/mL, and 9.7% among men with a sperm count of <5 x 106/mL). No dele­tion was identified among the infertile patients with oligo­asthenoteratozoospermia >5 x 106/mL and normoastheno­teratozoospermia. These data are in agreement with those already published in the literature.

Among the seven patients with micro-deletions, de­tected in our study, six carried a deletion limited to the AZFc region, while one had a larger deletion involving two AZF regions (b and c). Our results, confirm that AZFc deletions are the most common Y micro-deletions.

Many authors have tried to make genotype-spermato­genic phenotype correlation in patients with Y micro-deletions. However, these studies have shown that similar or identical deletions can cause different impairments of spermatogenesis. In our study, five of the six patients with AZFc deletions presented with azoospermia and one with severe oligozoospermia. The testicular histology was available in three of the patients with AZFc deletions, and showed SCOS in two and hypospermatogenesis in one. Our results support the observation that the most common Y micro-deletions, the AZFc deletions, are associated with different seminal pattern and testicular histology.

Of the seven patients with micro-deletions, six demon­strated no etiological cause of infertility, whereas in one a varicocele was present. Thus, our study confirmed the previous observations that Y deletions are present in pa­tients with non idiopathic infertility [15-17]. This supports the relevance of micro-deletion screening in patients with evident cause of infertility, such as a varicocele.


Although Y micro-deletions are compatible with natu­ral transmission [18,19], the vast majority of Y micro-deletion arise as a de novo event [20]. Family studies were available in one of our patients with a deletion and we have demonstrated that the AZFc deletion in this pa­tient had arisen as a de novo event.




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006