
QUANTITATIVE AND ELECTROPHORETIC ANALYSIS
OF COLLAGEN IN CULTURED FIBROBLASTS OF
TWO PATIENTS WITH A MILD TYPE I OF
OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA DURING
TREATMENT WITH BISPHOSPHONATES
Kocova M1,*, Galicka A2, Woczyñski S3, Sukarova-Angelovska E1, Stefanovska I4 *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Mirjana Kocova, Pediatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel: +389-2-3111-713; Fax: +389-2-3176-167; E-mail: ozonunit@unet. com.mk page: 13
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two children, a girl (P1) and a boy (P2), age 5.5 and 3.5 years, respectively, with multiple fractures occurring without significant trauma, were referred for clinical evaluation. The diagnosis of OI was based on the clinical history and clinical check up, X-rays of the bones, spine and skull, biochemistry data (serum electrolytes, alkaline phosphatase), and Osteo-Sonno assessment Index (OSI) for estimation of bone density. The type of the disease was determined according to criteria provided [2].
Therapy with disodium pamidronate, 1 mg/kg body weight was applied i.v. once a month. Serum electrolytes and alkaline phosphatase were determined monthly, X-rays and bone density measurements were performed at 6-month intervals. Bone density was measured by quantitative ultrasound skeletal densitometry using an AOS-100 apparatus (ALOKA Company, Tokyo, Japan). The OSI was calculated for each measurement and compared with controls.
Fibroblast Cultures. Skin biopsies were taken surgically 20 (P1) and 9 (P2) months after the introduction of therapy. A skin biopsy was also obtained from an unrelated healthy child, after surgery, with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Medical University, Bialystok, Poland, and with informed parental consent. Fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine, 50 U/mL penicillin, and 50 mg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2.
Electrophoretic Analysis of Collagen. Procollagen was labeled by incubation of confluent fibroblasts with 50 mCi/mL L-[5-3H]proline (28 Ci/mmol) for 18 hours in serum-free medium containing 50 mg/mL of ascorbic acid. The procollagen was harvested separately from the cell layer and the medium in the presence of proteinase inhibitors: 0.1 mM phenylmethanesulphonyl fluoride, 10 mM N-ethylmaleimide and 25 mM EDTA. The cell layer was scraped into 0.15 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing the proteinase inhibitors and sonicated. Procollagens were precipitated by 25% saturated (NH4)2 SO4 and the precipitates dissolved in 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5. Collagens were prepared by pepsin digestion (50 mg/mL) of procollagen samples [6]. Procollagen and collagen were electrophoresed on 5% (w/v) acrylamide separating gel with a 3.5% (w/v) acrylamide stacking gel, containing 2 M urea [6,12]. Gels were processed for fluorography with Amplify (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK).
Collagen Biosynthesis. Confluent cells were labeled in serum-free medium for 18 h with the L-[5-3H]proline (5 mCi/mL, 28 Ci/mmol). Incorporation into collagen was determined by digestion of proteins with purified Clostridium histolyticum collagenase [13].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|