
A NOVEL c.973G>T MUTATION IN THE ε-SUBUNIT OF THE
ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR CAUSING CONGENITAL
MYASTHENIC SYNDROME IN AN IRANIAN FAMILY Karimzadeh P1,2, Parvizi Omran S3, Ghaedi H4, Omrani MD4,* *Corresponding Author: Mir Davood Omrani, Ph.D., Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine,
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar Street, Daneshjoo Boulevard, Evin,
Chamran Highway, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran, 1985717443. E-mail: davood_omrani@sbmu.ac.ir page: 95
|
CLINICAL REPORT
The finding of a clinical report was established in
a 5 and half-month-old boy referred to the Department
of Pediatric Neurology at the Mofid Children’s Hospital,
Tehran, Iran due to bilateral ptosis. He was the product of
consanguineous marriage with an uneventful birth history.
Ptosis started when he was 2 months old and was exacerbated
by crying and breast feeding, which led to fatigue
and lack of sleep during this period. The family history
for neuromuscular disorders tested negative.
In a neurological examination, the patient showed
hypotonia bilateral ptosis but normal mental development
in terms of normal facial phenotypic expression followed
by a social smile (Figure 1). In order to rule out the etiology
of intracranial involvement, at first, we did a brain
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the result was
within normal limits. According to the above history and
physical examination, the top list of our diagnosis was
CMS. Therefore, electromyography (EMG) and nerve
conduction velocity (NCV), in the right and left deltoid,
biceps, triceps, extensor digitrum communis and first
dorsal interosseous in upper extremities and in right and
left gluteus medius, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior and
gastrocnemius (medial head in lower extremities evaluated
a 2+ fibrillation, normal NCV and low-amplitude
pattern were detected, although it showed some myopathic
pattern but the repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS)
test in abductor digiti minimi muscle did not show any
decremental pattern. This response could be due to the
young age of the patient. Creatine phosphokinase was
normal and antibody against the AChR was negative.
Neurometabolic disorders such as mitochondrial disease
would probably be given little attention because of the
early symptoms of ptosis and motor delay. We evaluated
serum urine and cerebral spinal fluid and the results
were within normal limits. Metabolic screenings, tandem
mass spectro chromatography, high performance liquid
chromatography of amino acids, urine organic acids,
ammonia and venous blood gas (VBG), were all within
normal limits. For confirmation of our diagnosis, we did
a genetic study of CMS.
Informed consent for the genetic studies and publication
of medical information was obtained from patient’s
parents. Venous blood sample was obtained from
the patient as well as from all his family members for
segregation analysis. Molecular analysis was designed
based on the mutation frequencies in genes responsible
for post-synaptic CMSs. The family were screened for
pathogenic variants in the CHRNE gene.
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral leukocytes
using standard procedures. Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) was carried out in a final volume of 50 μL using
PCR Master Mix (Ampliqon A/S, Odense, Denmark). The
PCR reactions were performed in a thermal cycler (Techne
® Prime; Techne, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK) for
5 min. at 95 °C followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for
30 seconds at 95 °C, annealing for 30 seconds depended
on the melting temperature of primers, primer extension
for 1 min. at 72 °C, with a final 5 min. extension at 72 °C.
The PCR product was evaluated on an 1.5% agarose gel.
Then, sequencing was carried out using an ABI PRISM®
3100 capillary sequencer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA,
USA). Sequences data were analyzed by comparing these
results with the reference wild-type sequence (GenBank
CHRNE accession numbers: NM_000080.3) using the
Finch TV program (version 1.4.0; Geospiza Inc., Seattle,
WA, USA).
Bioinformatics Analysis. To predict the possible
structural and functional effects of the newly identified
mutation in the CHRNE gene, the PolyPhen (Polymorphism
phenotyping-2) [5], MutationTaster [6] and SIFT
(Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant) [7] programs were used.
These are the most frequently used tools for variant effect
prediction. In order to classify the mutation, we used the
2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/
Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP)
guideline as implemented in the InterVar Web-server.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|