
DETERMINING SPECIFIC THYROID TRANSCRIPTS
IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD:
A SINGLE CENTER STUDY EXPERIENCE Makazlieva T, Eftimov A, Vaskova O, Tripunoski T,
Miladinova D, Risteski S, Jovanovic H, Jakovski Z
Tanja Makazlieva and Aleksandar Eftimov contributed equally to this study
and are considered first coauthors. *Corresponding Author: Tanja Makazlieva, Ph.D., Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine,
Medical Faculty, Mother Teresa Street, No. 17, 1000, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Mobile: +389-75-313-665. E-mail: tmakazlieva@medf.ukim.edu.mk or tmakazlieva@gmail.com page: 13
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects. The study included blood sampling from a
total of 57 subjects, including 40 patients with DTC and
17 healthy volunteers as a control group. The inclusion
criteria for the control group were normal isoechoic appearance
of the thyroid gland and absence of nodules at
ultrasound examination (US) of the neck (linear transducer
7.5-10 MHz), normal blood levels for thyroid stimulating
hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4), and antithyroid
antibodies that are below the level usually considered to be
clinically significant. In all patients from the DTC group,
the surgery and ablation treatment with radioactive 131I were
conducted at least 6 months before starting the research. In
all DTC patients blood samples for RNA extraction were
drawn prior to US neck examination. Similar to the concept
of risk stratification during follow up introduced by Tuttle
et al. [12], DTC patients were divided in three subgroups.
The three groups of patients were selected according to
blood levels of sTg (CRM 457, Immulite 2000; Siemens,
Munich, Bavaria, Germany) and aTg, as well as on the US
neck examination and findings from WBS after ablation
with 131I or diagnostic WBS. The first group consisted of
patients with incomplete structural response to treatment
and biochemical relapse of the disease, imaging confirmed
the metastatic spread or loco-regional relapse and elevated
sTg levels, >0.2 ng/mL (TCs 22 patients). The second
group were patients with incomplete biochemical response
and indeterminate response, with only elevated sTg (>0.2
ng/mL), or elevated aTg levels, without confirmed and
known morphological signs for relapse (TCb six patients).
The third group of patients were with complete structural
and biochemical response to therapy, excellent responders
(TCr 12 patients). Corresponding to the histopathological
type from 40 patients, four cases were FTC, 25 typical
variants of PTC, one PTC in thyroglossal duct cyst, one
papillary microcarcinoma, seven follicular variants of PTC
and two Hurtle cell carcinomas. The study was approved
by the Ethics Committee at the Medical Faculty of the
University “Ss Cyril and Methodius,” Skopje, Republic
of Macedonia, and written consent was obtained from all
subjects enrolled in the research.
RNA Extraction Procedure and Real Time-Polymerase
Chain Reaction. Whole blood samples were
drawn from HC and TC patients in standard 3 mL EDTA
blood vacutainers, total RNA was extracted using commercially
available RNA isolation kit GenElute™ Total RNA
purification kit (Sigma Aldrich Co. LLC, St. Louis, MO,
USA) and isolated total RNA was used for two step RTPCR
with ReadyScript™ cDNA Synthesis Mix kit (Sigma
Aldrich), according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. The PCR
step was performed using the following primer pairs:
TSHR-F 5’-GCT TTT CAG GGA CTA TGC AAT GAA-
3’ and TSHR-R 5’-AAG GGC AGT GAC ACT GGT TTG
AGA-3’, targeted to amplify a segment spanning exons 6 to
9 (nucleotides 555-767 or 212 bp) and Òg- F 5’-AGG GAA
ACG GCC TTT CTG AA-3’ and Tg-R 5’-GTG GAG AAG
ACG ACG ATT TC-3’, targeted to exons 1 to 5 (nucleotides
112-519 or 407 bp) [9]. The ubiquitously expressed
GAPDH gene was used to confirm RNA extraction and
RT-PCR using primers GAPDH-F 5’-TTC GTC ATG GGT
GTG AAC C-3’ and GAPDH-R 5’-GAT GAT GTT CTG
GAG AGC CC-3’, as previously reported [13,14]. For RT
quantitative PCR (qPCR), we used Hot FirePol Eva Green
qPCR Mix Plus (Rox) PCR master mix (Solis BioDyne,
Tartu, Estonia). The reaction mixture was incubated at 95
°C for 15 min., followed by 38 cycles of denaturation at 95
°C for 15 seconds, annealing at 62 °C for 20 seconds and
elongation at 72 °C for 20 seconds, for TSHR and Tg and
incubated at 95 °C for 15 min., followed by 38 cycles of
denaturation at 95 °C for 15 seconds, annealing at 57 °C
for 20 seconds and elongation at 72 °C for 20 seconds, for
GAPDH. All samples were analyzed in triplicate.
Relative Quantification Method. Relative quantification
was applied by calculating fold change in gene
expression of the TSHR and Tg target genes, normalized to
the endogenous reference gene GAPDH. Cycle threshold
(Ct), ΔCt, ΔΔCt and normalized relative expression ratio
values, were calculated according to the 2–ΔΔCt method,
by Livak and Schmittgen [15]. According to this method,
ΔCtTSHR = (average CtTSHR-average CtGAPDH), also for ΔCtTg = (average CtTg-average CtGAPDH) for every TC patient
and HC was calculated, and then ΔΔCt = [ΔCt(TC)-
ΔCt (HC)] was calculated from the average values of four
groups and later normalized expression ratio 2–ΔΔCt was
applied for fold change evaluation [15,16]. Statistically
significant differences among all groups were evaluated
with the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|