Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics

ASSOCIATION OF THE APOLIPOPROTEIN A-I GENE POLYMORPHISMS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK FACTORS AND ATHEROGENIC INDICES IN PATIENTS FROM ASSAM, NORTHEAST INDIA
Bora K1,2,*, Pathak MS2, Borah P3, Hussain Md.I.3, Das D4
*Corresponding Author: : Dr. Kaustubh Bora, Regional Medical Research Centre, Northeast Region, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), P.O. Box 105, Dibrugarh-786001, Assam, India. Tel: +91-943-557-2062. Fax: +91-364-253-8003. E-mail: kaustubhbora1@gmail.com
page: 59

DISCUSSION

We explored the associations of G-75A and C+83T SNPs in the study population with cardiovascular risk factors. Although the G-75A and C+83T polymorphic sites were reported to be associated with HDL-C levels in some studies [9,15-17], we observed no such association in our study. These polymorphisms did not confer greater risk of developing decreased HDL-C dyslipidemia in the current population. Lack of association between these SNPs and low HDL-C levels was also reported by other investigators [7,12,38]. We verified our findings in different genetic models (additive, dominant, recessive and allelic) and no relationship was found. It is possible that changes in HDL-C values across the genotypic variants of G-75A and C+83T loci reported in some of the earlier studies were actually modulated by confounding factors. This is substantiated by the fact that the effects of G-75A and C+83T SNPs on phenotypic characteristics have been found to be influenced by gender differences [13,39], smoking [39] and alcohol use [40]. Such biases have not been controlled for in many of the previous studies [9,16,17]. We took care to ensure that the effects of these SNPs were assessed after controlling for potential confounders in the data analysis. Moreover, many conditions that may spuriously alter lipid levels in the cases were excluded in the design stage itself. Among the other serum lipids, we found that the minor A allele in the G-75A locus was associated with adverse LDL-C levels. The AA and GA genotypes had high LDL-C values. This was consistent with the findings of previous investigators [4,38]. However, few studies have found the A allele to produce beneficial effects on LDLC [41]. These discordant results may be due to linkage disequilibrium between the G-75A SNP and some other regulatory elements in close proximity that actually influence the levels of LDL-C. For example, strong linkage was observed between the A allele (of the G-75A site) and X2 allele (of the XmnI RFLP site) in the 5’-flanking region of APOA1 [4]. The X2 allele of the XmnI polymorphism has been found to be associated with LDL-C levels [42]. Future studies using sequencing would be of help in verifying such possibilities. On the other hand, we found that the C>T transition at C+83T locus favorably affected TG and VLDL-C concentrations. Our results were in agreement to those by Ma et al. [43] who also found that the CT heterozygotes had lower TG than the CC homozygotes. The association with VLDL-C levels were expected because TG and VLDL-C metabolism are intimately related, and their values are proportional to one another [33]. It was suggested that the C+83T locus may have a role in regulating TG levels in Oriental subjects [43]. The biological mechanism causing these effects is uncertain. It was hypothesized that APOA1 variants may affect the lipase-mediated breakdown of TG particles in the plasma, thus modulating their concentration [14]. The association of the two SNPs with several atherogenic indices was a novel and significant finding of the current study. Genetic factors affecting atherogenic indices have been investigated infrequently. We found that the minor A allele at the G-75A site was associated with adverse values of CRI-I, CRI-II, non-HDL-C and AC, whereas, the minor T allele at the C+83T site was associated with favorable values of AIP. These pro-atherogenic effects of the G-75A polymorphism and the anti-atherogenic effects of the C+83T polymorphism on the atherogenic indices may be important modulators of CVD risks that are often described in relation to these two SNPs. Recent data have shown that atherogenic indices (viz. CRI-I, CRI-II, AIP, non-HDL-C, AC) are valuable predictors of CVD risk [27-30]. The usefulness of the traditional serum lipid measures (viz. TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C and TG) is mainly limited to predicting risk for those at the lower and the higher end of the CVD risk spectrum. In contrast, the atherogenic indices, being composite measures, take into account several lipid fractions. Thus, they reflect the bi-directional cholesterol traffic (in and outward) through the arterial intima and are more robust in predicting CVDs than individual lipid fractions [28,29]. There are contradictory reports about the effects of G-75A and C+83T SNPs on indices of obesity and BP. These SNPs were not associated with WC, BMI, systolic and diastolic BP in the current population. In conformity to the present findings, no association of the G-75A locus was detected with obesity and BP by Ma et al. [43] and de Franca et al. [6]. In contrast, Kim and Hong [18] reported association of the G-75A locus with obesity indices. On the other hand, Coban et al. [13] detected significant associations of the G-75A locus with BP, but not with obesity (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2). For the C+83T locus, de Franca et al. [6] found no significant variation in obesity measures across the genotypes. This was in agreement with our findings. But Ma et al. [43] found the C+83T site to be associated with BP and obesity measures in diabetic subjects. In view of the above findings, it seems that these effects, if at all present, are remarkable only in some populations and that they are of an indirect nature, perhaps as a result of interaction with environmental and other genetic factors [43]. A limitation of our study was its design with respect to the secondary objectives. As our primary objective was to investigate the association of the polymorphisms with the risk of developing decreased HDL-C, we therefore had to recruit the subjects as case and control groups on the basis of HDL-C status. Thus, we could not use contingency tables and risk estimates (e.g., OR) to study the secondary objectives (i.e., association of the polymorphisms with other CVD risk factors such as TC, LDL-C, TG, VLDLC, obesity indices, BP and atherogenic indices). However, this was circumvented by studying the associations using ANCOVA, and backing up the results with effect size calculations. It would also have been desirable to replicate and validate our findings in additional independent samples from other parts of northeast India and the adjoining regions.

Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024	Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one	Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement	Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022	Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021	Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020	Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019	Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018	Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement	Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017	Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016	Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015	Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014	Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013	Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement	Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011	Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011	Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010	Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009	Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008	Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10 10 (1),2007	Number 9 1&2, 2006
Number 9 3&4, 2006	Number 8 1&2, 2005
Number 8 3&4, 2004	Number 7 1&2, 2004
Number 6 3&4, 2003	Number 6 1&2, 2003
Number 5 3&4, 2002	Number 5 1&2, 2002
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000	Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998	Number 4 3&4, 2001
Number 4 1&2, 2001	Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999	Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000	Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999	Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999	Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998

About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact