
THE INFLUENCE OF CYP2C8*3 ON CARBAMAZEPINE SERUM
CONCENTRATION IN EPILEPTIC PEDIATRIC PATIENTS Milovanovic DD, Milovanovic JR, Radovanovic M, Radosavljevic I,
Obradovic S, Jankovic S, Milovanovic D, Djordjevic N *Corresponding Author: M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology
and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Svetozara Markovica 69, 34 000 Kragujevac,
Serbia. Tel: +381-34-306-800, ext 223. Fax: +381-34-306-800. E-mail: natashadj2002@yahoo.com page: 21
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted at the Clinical Centre,
Kragujevac, Serbia, and involved 40 epileptic pediatric
patients on ongoing therapy with carbamazepine
[9]. Except for four patients, who were on comedication
with valproate, all others were on monotherapy.
The study was approved by the relevant Ethics Committee
(approval No. 01-7848) and conducted in accordance
with the Declaration of Helsinki and its
subsequent revisions.
Blood samples for drug concentration analysis
were collected twice, both times at the minimal concentration
point (8-12 hours after the administration
of the last dose): at the beginning of the study, and
4 weeks after dose adjustment. The steady-state carbamazepine
serum concentrations were determined
by validated high pressure liquid chromatography
(HPLC) assay, as described by Jankovic et al. [10].
An additional blood sample was taken for CYP2C8
genotyping, and DNA was isolated using the PurelinkTM
genomic DNA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA, USA). CYP2C8*3 (416G>A, rs11572080)
and CYP2C8*5 (475delA, rs72558196) were genotyped
using polymerase chain reaction-restriction
fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and
allele-specific (AS)-PCR methods, respectively, according
to Nakajima et al. [11]. Primers and restriction
enzyme were from Invitrogen and New England
Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA), respectively, while all
other reagents used were made by Thermo Scientific
(Waltham, MA, USA) or Qiagen GmbH (Hilden,
Germany). Electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel,
stained with SybrŪ safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen),
was used to detect the obtained PCR products and
restriction fragments.
To determine the factors affecting carbamazepine
clearance, population pharmacokinetic modeling
was employed, using the nonlinear mixed effect
model (NONMEM) software, version 7.3.0 (Icon
Development Solution, Hanover, MD, USA), and
ADVAN 1 subroutine (within NONMEM) (one compartment
model with no absorption). Carbamazepine
serum concentrations, age, body weight, sex, total
carbamazepine daily dose, CYP2C8 genotype and
concomitant therapy with valproate, were included
as covariates by the stepwise addition process in the
model construction, and their significance was estimated
by the likelihood ratio test. The final model
was built through a backward deletion from the full
model, using covariates that met criteria of the minimum
objective function value difference of more than
6.6 for nominal p <0.01 and degree of freedom (df) =
1. Inter-patient varia-bility of the clearance and intrapatient
(residual) variability in the concentration was
estimated by exponential, additive, or proportional
error model. Data distribution was assessed through
the ratio of predicted (PRED) and measured the dependent
variable (DV) concentrations of the drug, as
well as the ratio in the weighted residuals (WRES)
and PRED values of carbamazepine from the base to
the final model. Bootstrapping analysis, as a preferable
validation procedure for the small study sample
size, was used to evaluate the predictive performance
of the final model.
Statistical Analyses. The haplotype analysis
was done by the population genetic software program
Arlequin, version 3.11 (http://cmpg.unibe.
ch/software/arlequin3), and Statistica, version 7.1
(StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used for all other
statistical analyses. The observed and expected allele
frequencies were compared by the χ2 test, and
consistency of the data with the normal distribution
was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Spearman
analysis was used to correlate doses and concentrations
of carbamazepine, and the Student t-test for
independent groups was used for assessment of dose
requirements and carbamazepine serum concentrations
in the CYP2C8*3 carrier and non carrier groups.
A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|