
EPIGENETIC ALTERATIONS IN PATIENTS
WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS Karachanak-Yankova S1,a, Dimova R2,a, Nikolova D1, Nesheva D1, Koprinarova M3,
Maslyankov S4, Tafradjiska R5, Gateva P6, Velizarova M7, Hammoudeh Z1, Stoynev N2,
Toncheva D1, Tankova T2, Dimova I1,* *Corresponding Author: Ivanka Dimova, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Genetics, Medical University
Sofia, Zdrave str. 2, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria. Tel: +359-2-91-72-735. E-mail: ivanka.i.dimova@ gmail.com page: 15
|
RESULTS
Expression Profile of MBD2 in Patients with
T2DM. The gene expression analysis of MBD2 performed
for each of the 12 controls and 16 T2DM
patients revealed a 10.4-times increase on average
in MBD2 mRNA levels in patients compared to
controls (Figure 1a). The separate analysis in each
patient group showed the highest increase in the
newly-diagnosed (treatment-naïve) T2DM patients;
12.9-times average increase, followed by 10.4-times
average increase in patients with T2DM duration of
less than 5 years and 6.1-times average increase in
T2DM patients with duration of the disease of more
than 5 years (Figure 1b to 1d).
Methylation Analysis of Genes Connected to
Stress and Toxicity in Patients with T2DM. Using
EpiTect Methyl II Signature PCR Array (Qiagen
Sciences Inc.), the methylated and non methylated
fraction of 11 genes, connected to cellular response
to stress and toxicity, were successfully analyzed in
all DNA pools. The methylation fraction of these
genes is represented in Table 3.
In the healthy controls, the methylated fraction
was 0% in six of the analyzed genes, ranged from 1.4 to 7.3% in four genes and was 98.5% for the
GDF15 gene. In newly-diagnosed T2DM patients,
the methylated fraction was 0% only in one gene,
98.4% in GDF15 and increased to values between
4.9 and 23.6% for the remainder of the genes. In
patients with T2DM duration of less than 5 years,
the methylated fraction was 97.7% for GDF15 and
varied between 0.5 and 22.4% for all other genes.
Among T2DM patients with duration of more than 5
years, the methylated fraction was 0% in two of the
analyzed genes, 95.9% for GDF15 and ranged from
7.6 to up to 47.8% for the rest of the genes.
The genes Gadd45G, Gpx3 and RARA showed
the highest methylated fraction in newly-diagnosed
T2DM patients, probably due to the poor glycemic
control. Five genes were with consistently increased
methylated fraction during the course of the disease:
BRCA1, CCND1, Prdx2, SCARA3 and Tp53 (Figure
2). There was a slight decrease in the methylated
fraction of GDF15 with increase in the duration of
T2DM.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|