
RING AUTOSOMES: SOME UNEXPECTED FINDINGS Caba L1,*, Rusu C1,2, Plăiaşu V3, Gug G4,5, Grămescu M1, Bujoran C2,
Ochiană D3, Voloşciuc M2, Popescu R1, Braha E1,2, Pânzaru M1,2,
Butnariu L1,2, Sireteanu A1, Covic M1, Gorduza EV1 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Lavinia Caba, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Department
of Medical Genetics, 16 Universitatii str., Iasi, 700115, Romania; Tel.: +40724962671; Email: lavinia_zanet@yahoo.com page: 35
|
RESULTS
38 cm and head circumference (OFC) 28
cm. Postnatal development showed severe developmental
delay, hyperactivity, aggression, mewing
cry in the neonatal period. Clinical examination at
3 years of age revealed short stature [–2.8 standard
deviation (SD), microcephaly (OFC –4.3 SD), dysmorphic
face (triangular face, mild facial asymmetry,
hypertelorism, abnormal, low set, asymmetric ears)
(Figure 1). She presented severe mental retardation
(IQ 40) and challenging behavior. Echocardiography
showed: subaortic ventricular septal defect (VSD),
tri-cuspid insufficiency, foramen ovale apertum without pulmonary hypertension. Renal ultrasound was
normal. The clinical diagnostic supposition was Cri
du Chat syndrome. Blood karyotype: mos 46,XX,r(5)
(p14q35)[80]/45,XX,-5[8]/47,XX,r(5)(p14q35),r(5)
(p14q35)[3] (Figure 2). The karyotype of both parents
was normal.
Case 2. A boy, born at full-term, weight 1600
g, length 42 cm and OFC 28 cm (severe intrauterine growth retardation). The patient was the first child
of a young, apparently healthy and unrelated couple.
Clinical exam at age of 2 days showed: growth retardation,
microcephaly with doli-cocephaly, hypertelorism,
epicanthic folds, small nose with anteverted
nostrils, broad and prominent nasal bridge, ogival
palatine vault, long philtrum, micrognathia, big, low
set ears with posterior rotation, short neck, micropenis,
anteriorly displaced anus and deep sacral dimple (Figure
3). Hematological investigations, liver and renal function tests were normal. Cardiac ultrasonography
attested patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), foramen ovale
apertum and diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle.
The postnatal evolution was marked by severe
growth retardation and the child died at the age of 2
months. Blood karyotype: mos 46,XY,r(13)(p11.2q34)
[51]/45,XY,-13[12]/46,XY,dic r(13)(p11.2q34)[1]
(Figure 4). The karyotype of both parents was normal.
Case 3. A girl born at full term weighing 3400 g
and length of 54 cm. She is the second child of a couple
apparently healthy and unrelated (mother aged 32
years and father aged 42 years at time of conception).
Clinical examination at the age of 13 years and
7 months revealed: weight = 43.5kg, height = 152
cm, OFC = 51.5 cm, dys-morphic features (hypertelorism,
facial scar secondary to surgical procedures
to correct cleft lip), mental retardation (she doesn’t
attend a mainstream school). From pathological history
we mention: left cleft lip surgically corrected,
sensorineural hearing loss, bilateral stenosis of external
auditory canals, clubfoot. Cranial magnetic
resonance imaging: acquired lesion of corpus callosum.
Blood karyotype: mos 46,XX,r(18)(p11.32q23)
[43]/47,XX,r(18) (p11.32q23),+mar[7] (figure 5).
Blood karyotype of both parents was normal.
For supplementary investigation of the ring
chromosome 18, FISH probes for telomeres of chromosome
18 (Aquarius®; Cytocell Technologies Ltd.)
were applied. The results of the investigation showed
the presence of telomeres for the normal chromosome
18 only (green signal) and absence of the telomeres
for the ring chromosome 18 (Figure 6). Case 4. A girl, born at full-term, weight 3000 g,
length 50 cm and head circumference 34 cm. Her parents
were young, apparently healthy and unrelated.
Clinical examination at the age of 2 showed: weight =
8000 g, height = 84 cm, OFC = 46 cm, dysmorphic features
(hypertelorism, narrow ear canals, micrognathia),
club foot varus, impaired hearing, developmental delay.
Abdominal ultrasound revealed horseshoe kidneys.
Blood karyotype 46,XX,r(18) (p11.32q21.3) (Figure
7). Blood karyotype of both parents was normal.
To investigate the breakpoints on ring chromosome
18, we applied FISH probes for both subtelomeres
18p (D18S552 – red) and 18q (D18S1390
– green) of chromosome 18 (Aquarius®; Cytocell
Technologies Ltd.). The results of the investigation
showed the presence of subtelo-meric FISH signals
only on the normal chromosome 18 [red signal for
18 short arm (p) and green signal for 18 long arm
(q)] and the absence of fluorescent signals on ring
chromosome 18 (Figure 8). We also used FISH analysis
with Aquarius® Whole Chromosome Painting
Probes (Cytocell Technologies Ltd.) marked with a
green fluoro-phore for chromosome 18; this attested
the origin of the ring chromosome (Figure 9).
Case 5. A boy, born at full-term, weight 3500
g, length 52 cm and OFC 35 cm. His parents were
young and non consanguineous. Clinical examination
at age of 2 months showed: weight = 4940 g,
height = 53 cm, dysmorphic fea-tures (short neck,
narrow bitemporal diameter, preauricular pits, large
ears, bulbous nose, anteverted nostrils, long philtrum,
macrostomia, thin upper lip, short lingual fren-ula),
hypospadias. Echocardiography discovered VSD and
PDA. Blood karyotype 46,XY,r(18)(p11.32q23) (Figure
10). Blood karyotype of both parents was normal. Case 6. A boy, born prematurely with a weight
of 2000 g, length 48 cm, and an Apgar score of 7.
Obstetrical history indicated an imminent abortion
two months after conception. Clinical examination
at 2 months old revealed: microcephaly, dysmorphic
craniofacial features with high forehead, down-slanted
palpebral fissure, low set ears, prominent antihelix,
flattened helix, large concha, micro-gnathia, microstoma,
cleft palate. The patient also presented muscular
hypertonia, systolic heart murmur, umbilical and
inguinal bilateral hernia, undescended right testis,
right simian crease, left Sydney crease. The patient’s
evolution did not improve and he died at 3 months.
The postmortem examination revealed a large septal
atrial defect (for this old case, the echocardiography
was unavailable). Karyotype 46,XY,r(21) (Figure 11).
Blood karyotype of both parents was normal.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|