
RING AUTOSOMES: SOME UNEXPECTED FINDINGS Caba L1,*, Rusu C1,2, Plăiaşu V3, Gug G4,5, Grămescu M1, Bujoran C2,
Ochiană D3, Voloşciuc M2, Popescu R1, Braha E1,2, Pânzaru M1,2,
Butnariu L1,2, Sireteanu A1, Covic M1, Gorduza EV1 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Lavinia Caba, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Department
of Medical Genetics, 16 Universitatii str., Iasi, 700115, Romania; Tel.: +40724962671; Email: lavinia_zanet@yahoo.com page: 35
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We collected the cases from three different laboratories
in Romania, namely the Cytogenetic Laboratory
of “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and
Pharmacy, Iasi, the Cytogenetic Laboratory of “Prof.
Dr. Alfred Rusescu” National Institute for Mother
and Child Care, Bucharest, and a private Cytogenetic
Laboratory from Timisoara (Table 1). Our study was
based on conventional banding cytogenetic and fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. In all
cases, the chromosomal analysis was performed on a
short time T lymphocyte culture stimulated by phytohemagglutinin.
The chromosomes were G-banded
using trypsin and Giemsa solution according to standard
techniques. Conventional banding cytogenetic
analysis was performed both for the proband and his/
her parents in all cases.
The FISH protocol was only applied for the
cases with ring chromosome 18. In these cases,
FISH was performed using chromosome 18-specific
direct-labeled probes: telomeric probes for chromosome
18 (Aquarius®; Cytocell Technologies Ltd.,
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK) and Aquarius®
Whole Chromosome Painting Probes (Cytocell Technologies
Ltd.). The results of conventional banding
cytogenetic analysis and FISH were elaborated in
accordance with the guidelines of the International
System of Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (2009)
(ISCN) [22].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|