
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF RING Y CHROMOSOME
IN A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY WITH MIXED GONADAL
DYSGENESIS AND GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY Milenkovic T1,*, Guc-Scekic M2, Zdravkovic D1,3, Topic V4,
Liehr T5, Joksic G6, Radivojevic D2, Lakic N2 *Corresponding Author: Tatjana Milenkovic, Department of Endocrinology, Institute for Mother and Child
Healthcare of Serbia “Dr. Vukan Cupic,” Radoja Dakica 6-8, 11 070 Belgrade, Serbia; Tel.: +381-11-3018-109;
Fax: +381-11-3108-257; E-mail: tanjamil@eunet.rs page: 71
|
DISCUSSION
We present a male patient with MGD and a mosaic
karyotype with a high percentage of monosomic 45,X
cell line and two ring (Y) variants presented in different
combinations within at least three cellular subpopulations.
Cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic and molecular
analyses demonstrated that the two breakpoints
on the Y chromosome were localized on the Yp arm
(between the subtelomeric region and the telomere)
and the Yq arm at Yq12 (the AZF region was present),
respectively, leading to fusion of the broken ends and
loss of genetic material. As the father’s karyotype is
normal, ring formation occurred de novo in this patient.
The presence of two ring (Y) variants, monocentric
ring Y and dicentric ring (Y;Y), could result from
the specific behavior of the ring chromosome during
mitosis depending on the number of sister chromatid
exchanges (SCEs). These SCEs could result in the formation
of dicentric Y chromosomes, which would then
undergo unequal partition during successive mitotic
divisions inducing the formation of rings of different
sizes [4,21]. Non disjunction could produce a general
increase in the number of rings in different cellular
populations, as was the case in our patient.
The high percentage of the monosomic 45,X cell
line in our patient, due to the instability of the ring
chromosome during mitosis, could explain his short
stature. The presence of subtelomere Yp signal on the
r(Y) chromosome suggests that the genetic material
loss implicated in ring Y formation did not include the
SHOX/PHOG gene, which is localized in the PAR1
region [4,21,22]. Molecular analysis showed the presence
of the SRY gene. The dicentric ring (Y;Y) found
in one cell suggests the presence of a cell line with
two copies of SRY. More cells carrying the SRY gene
result in more testicular structures and increased virilization
due to higher production of testosterone by
Leydig cells [2]. Bettio et al. [23] indicated that phenotypic
sex is determined by the presence of the 45,X vs.
SRY-bearing cells and depends more on the number of
copies of the SRY gene rather than on the percentage of
45,X cells, at least in the gonads. The degree of mosaicism
varies between tissues, and a mosaic karyotype
is often associated with MGD [24].
Molecular analysis showed the presence of AZF
(AZFa, AZFb, AZFc), SRY and ZFY/ZFX genes that
correlated with the pathological findings at testis biopsy,
which revealed testicular tissue with initial spermatogenesis.
Also, there was a normal testosterone
response to a short HCG test.
According to the literature, the association of
mixed gonadal dysgenesis and ring Y chromosome
is extremely rare [2,12]. Our patient is the third patient
with such abnormalities to be described in the
literature. All patients have been short for their target
height, but the two previous cases were not reported
to have GH deficiency (Table 1). In our patient, the
diagnosis of severe GH deficiency was established according
to results of clonidine test as well as results of
overnight profile of GH. Thus, he is the first reported
case of gonadal dysgenesis associated with a ring Y
chromosome whose short stature could be explained
not only by the presence of a high percentage of monosomic
cells, but also by GH deficiency. The first-year
response to GH treatment with a standard dose of GH
was successful. Normal levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3
could be explained by obesity, insulin resistance and
hyperinsulinemia [25].
As with one patient reported previously [12], our
patient was obese with significant acanthosis nigricans
and pseudogynecomastia. His obesity was secondary
to excessive food intake, consistent with the family’s
overall nutrition. Insulin resistance and acanthosis
nigricans could be explaines as a common finding in
obese children, as well as his advanced bone age. The
obesity and acanthosis persisted after 1 year of GH
therapy suggesting that the obesity at presentation was
not a consequence of hypopituitarism.
Although short stature in patients with MGD associated
with ring Y chromosomes can almost always
be explained as a consequence of the high percentage
of monosomic cells, or loss of SHOX and other genes important for growth, test for GH secretion should be
performed in each child with impaired growth. Further
studies are necessary to define the importance of provocative
tests and/or overnight profile of GH in short
patients with MGD.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|