
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF RING Y CHROMOSOME
IN A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY WITH MIXED GONADAL
DYSGENESIS AND GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY Milenkovic T1,*, Guc-Scekic M2, Zdravkovic D1,3, Topic V4,
Liehr T5, Joksic G6, Radivojevic D2, Lakic N2 *Corresponding Author: Tatjana Milenkovic, Department of Endocrinology, Institute for Mother and Child
Healthcare of Serbia “Dr. Vukan Cupic,” Radoja Dakica 6-8, 11 070 Belgrade, Serbia; Tel.: +381-11-3018-109;
Fax: +381-11-3108-257; E-mail: tanjamil@eunet.rs page: 71
|
RESULTS
Karyotype analysis of G-banded lymphocyte chromosomes
revealed a 45,X karyotype in 24/44 (54.5%)
cells, a normal number of chromosomes with a small,
dot-like ring chromosome in 17/44 (38.6%) cells, and
47 chromosomes with two ring chromosomes (Figure
1A and 1B) in 3/44 (6.8%) cells. We considered the
small ring chromosome to have originated from the
Y chromosome and described the patient’s karyotype
as: mos 45,X[24]/46,X, r(?Y)[17]/47,X, r(?Y)x2[3].
Parental karyotypes were normal. The C-banding
analysis of the heterochromatic Yqh region of the patient
and his father showed the loss of this region in
the patient and its presence in the father, suggesting a
de novo origin of the ring chromosome. Fluorescent in
situ hybridization using a Y chromosome centromeric
α satellite probe demonstrated the absence of a fluorescent
signal in 31/100 cells and the presence of one
(19/100) and two (2/100) fluorescent signals in interphase
nuclei and metaphase cells (Figure 1C and 1D).
When a Y chromosome centromeric α satellite probe
was used, one fluorescent signal was found on the ring
Y chromosome, confirming its monocentric nature.
The somatic karyotype was therefore described as:
45,X[31]/46,X.ishr(Y) (DYZ1+) [19]/ 47,X.ish r(Y)
x2(DYZ1x2)[2].
SubcenM-FISH [25] characterized two ring (Y)
variants in the patient’s karyotype: ish r(Y)(RP11-
115H13+, cepY+,RP11.71M14+) and ishr(Y;Y)(RP11-
115H13++, cepY++,RP11.71M14++) (Figure 2A).
These were present in different combinations in at least
three cellular subpopulations: 46,X,r(Y);47,X,r(Y)x2;
47,X,r(Y)+r(Y;Y). The additional ring (Y;Y) variant,
found in only one cell, was a ring chromosome in the
process of forming a double ring.
Telo-FISH displayed an r(Y) chromosome with
no telomeric signals (Figure 2C), thus confirming loss
of telomeric regions on Yp and Yq. Fluorescent in situ
hybridization with the subtelomeric probe Xp/Yp and
probe for Yq12, demonstrated the presence of the Yp
subtelomeres and deletion of Yq12 region on the r(Y).
The double Y chromosome r(Y;Y) showed two signals
for the Yp subtelomere region (Figure 2B).
Polymerase chain reaction with primers for the
heterochromatic region of the Y chromosome revealed
that the whole of this Yq12 region was missing. Multiplex
PCR with selected primers for AZF (the AZFa,
AZFb and AZFc) region, SRY and ZFY/ZFX genes
showed their presence (Figure 3). These results confirmed
the presence of two breakpoints on the Y chromosome
that led to formation of the ring: one on the
Yp arm (between the subtelomeric region and the telomere)
and the other on the Yq arm at Yq12.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|