
EXPLORING CANDIDATE GENES FOR EPILEPSY
BY COMPUTATIONAL DISEASE-GENE
IDENTIFICATION STRATEGY Sha Y, Liu Q, Wang Y, Dong C, Song L *Corresponding Author: Ying Sha, Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Jilin University,
Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China; Tel.: +86-1387-878-9232; Fax: +86-1387-778-7078;
E-mail: shaying2010@ 126.com page: 35
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Forty-eight genes were selected as potential
epilepsy susceptibility genes (Table 1). Interesting
genes indicated by all the tools are known to be
associated with epilepsy, such as APOE, GABRA1
and GABRG2. GABRA1 and GABRG2 are subunits
of the ligand-gated chloride channel receptors of
GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in
the mammalian brain. For the APOE gene, many
studies have found that its polymorphism is strongly
correlated with different kinds of epilepsy. The
ApoE-ε allele interacts with longstanding seizures
to affect verbal and nonverbal memory performance
in patients with medically intractable temporal lobe
epilepsy [13]. This allele also increases the risk
of postictal confusion [14]. Salzmann et al. [15]
confirmed that the role of APOE in the temporal lobe
epilepsy. In our study, all these widely referred genes
were discovered by most of the bioinformatic tools.
Canonical Pathways. Four canonical pathways
were selected by the identified candidate genes (Table
2) with significant confidence: GABA receptor
signaling, interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling, G-protein
coupled receptor signaling, type 2 diabetes mellitus
signaling and airway inflammation in asthma.
Here, 35 of the 48 identified genes were used in the
pathway analysis of the IPA system. These genes
generated four significant networks (Figure 1):
Network 1 with a score of 38 and 17 focus genes,
which is related to carbohydrate metabolism, small
molecule biochemistry and cellular movement;
Network 2 with a score of 27 and 13 focus genes,
which is related to psychological disorders, genetic
disorder and neurological disease according to the
description in the IPA system; Network 3 with a score
of 22 and 11 focus genes, related to cardiovascular
disease, neurological disease and drug metabolism;
and Network 4 with a score of eight and five focus
genes, related to cell signaling, molecular transport,
vitamin and mineral metabolism.
Comparison of Online Analytical Tools.
There was wide variation between the tools
regarding which genes were prioritized, and their
rank orders. PosMed and PandS were most similar
in their prioritization.
A combination of two or all of the tools was
superior for ranking positional candidates [16]. Some
methods have a significant identity of candidate genes,
which may affect the accuracy of gene prioritization.
PanS, GenWanderer and PosMed use the same input
information and show a high degree of similarity
on their outputs. The selection of a candidate gene
by several methods using the same input data may
be less valuable than the selection of a candidate by
several methods using disparate data sources [1]. In
this study, we excluded candidate genes that were
solely identified by two of the online tools, i.e.,
GenWanderer and PosMed. We also restricted the
selection to only the top 10 genes as candidate list so
as to provide more convergent results.
We concluded that bioinformatic tools were
helpful in the hunt for complex disease genes. Our
list of most likely candidate genes and the associated
pathways should assist further experimental design
and analysis, and therefore, our understanding of
the pathogenesis of epilepsy.
In addition, we have to say that using different
online analytical tools might generate different
results, and we selected the tools that were
successfully applied to previous studies. We only
selected four tools from a number of available
resources, all of which easily perform the analyses,
fast to obtain results and the corresponding results
are reliable. In fact, there are some more tools
widely applied in previous studies. However, due to
a variety of reasons, we did not adopt them into our
study. For example, GeneSeeker [17] is not currently
operating and we cannot obtain a complete result;
Endeavor is very slow during the prioritization
process; Prioritizer [18] needs to download a large
size of full software and associated data, while the
output text for the G2D tool [19] is not easily edited
for comparison.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|