
CAG REPEAT NUMBER IN THE ANDROGEN RECEPTOR
GENE AND PROSTATE CANCER Madjunkova S, Eftimov A, Georgiev V, Petrovski D, Dimovski AJ, Plaseska-
Karanfi lska D, *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfi lska, Macedonian Academy of Sciences
and Arts, Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology “Georgi D. Efremov”, Av. Krste
Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3235-410; Fax: +389-2-3115-
434; E-mail: dijana@manu.edu.mk page: 31 download article in pdf format
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second leading cause
of cancer deaths in men. The effects of androgens
on prostatic tissue are mediated by the androgen receptor
(AR) gene. The 5’ end of exon 1 of the AR
gene includes a polymorphic CAG triplet repeat that
numbers between 10 to 36 in the normal population.
The length of the CAG repeats is inversely related
to the transactivation function of the AR gene.
There is controversy over association between short
CAG repeat numbers in the AR gene and PC. This
retrospective case-control study evaluates the possible
effect of short CAG repeats on the AR gene
in prostate cancer risk in Macedonian males. A total
of 392 male subjects, 134 PC patients, 106 patients
with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and
152 males from the general Macedonian population
were enrolled in this study. The CAG repeat length
was determined by fl uorescent polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) amplifi cation of exon1 of the AR gene
followed by capillary electrophoresis (CE) on a genetic
analyzer. The mean repeat length in PC patients
was 21.5 2.65, in controls 22.28 2.86 (p =
0.009) and in BPH patients 22.1 2.52 (p = 0.038).
Short CAG repeats (<19) were found in 21.64% of
PC patients vs. 9.43% in BPH patients (p = 0.0154).
We also found an association of low Gleason score
(<7) with short CAG repeat (<19) in PC patients (p
= 0.0306), and no association between the age at
diagnosis of PC and BPH and CAG repeat length.
These results suggest that reduced CAG repeat
length may be associated with increased prostate
cancer risk in Macedonian men.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|