
APPLICATION OF PRENATAL TESTING FOR
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS. AN ILLUSTRATIVE CASE REPORT
Yapijakis C1,2, Serefoglou Z1, Sakellariou M1, Karahalios S3, Koufaliotis N3 *Corresponding Author: Christos Yapijakis, DMD, MS, PhD, Department of Neurology, University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, 74 Vas. Sofias, Athens 11528, Greece; Tel: +30-210-8811 243; Fax: +30-210-7289 125; E-mail: cyapijakis_ua_gr@yahoo.com page: 67
|
Abstract
In Greek and other European populations, about 65% of women are healthy carriers of the cytomegalovirus (CMV). As a consequence, CMV appears to be a serious common threat for pregnancies. The risk of fetal CMV infection may be either 25-50% in case of a primary maternal infection during pregnancy, or 0.5-3.5% in case of a recurrent maternal infection. The symptoms of congenital CMV infection vary considerably from case to case, and may include severe congenital cytomegalic inclusion disease with signs of prematurity, jaundice with hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenic purpura, and central nervous system damage. We present here an illustrative case of a pregnant woman who was advised by her obstetrician to undergo prenatal molecular testing for CMV, although she was just a carrier of the virus, and she had had no recurrence of infection. The woman and her husband came to our Center for genetic counseling, after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of amniotic fluid indicated the presence of CMV DNA; the obstetrician advised termination of the pregnancy. In order to distinguish between the possibilities of real fetal CMV infection, or of a false positive result due to contamination of the amniotic fluid sample by maternal leucocytes during amniocentesis, we advised an additional immunological and molecular test of the woman’s blood sample.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing for serum anti-CMV antibodies was positive for IgG and negative for IgM. The molecular test detected DNA of CMV in total blood of the pregnant woman, but not in her serum. These results indicated that there was no recurrence of CMV infection, and the amniotic fluid sample was simply contaminated by maternal blood. Therefore, the parents were advised to continue the pregnancy with ultrasound monitoring by the caring obstetrician, and a healthy baby was born. We consider that our contribution in avoiding an iatrogenic error was very positive, especially in light of the fact that the first child of the same couple had been previously diagnosed in our Centre as having frontonasal dysplasia. This syndrome, characterized by midface defects including cleft lip and palate, was caused by an environmental factor (estrogens prescribed during second month of pregnancy). We discuss here the proper strategy for prevention of a fetal CMV infection, including prenatal molecular testing when it is justified.
Key words: cytomegalovirus (CMV), infection during pregnancy, prenatal testing, genetic counseling, frontonasal dysplasia.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|