
INVOLVEMENT OF CHROMOSOMES 7, 18 AND X
IN MITOMYCIN C-INDUCED MICRONUCLEI Hovhannisyan GG1,2*, Mkrtchyan H1,2, Liehr T2, Aroutiounian R1 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Galina G. Hovhannisyan, Department of Genetics and Cytology,
State University, Biological Faculty, 1 Alex Manoukian Street, Yerevan 375025, Armenia; Tel.:
+374-10552354; Fax: +374-10554641; e-mail: hovgalina@list.ru page: 45
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In situ hybridization with wcp and cep for chromosomes 7, 18 and X was used to analyze the presence of specific chromosomal material in MN induced in human lymphocytes by MMC. Mitomycin C is often used as a positive control in studies with MN tests [20] and is reported to induce breakage mainly in the pericentromeric heterochromatin [21]. The results obtained are shown in Figure 1 and summarized in Table 1. We found that in the female cells a total of 4.16% MN contain centromere-specific signals and 8.41% MN contain wcp signals from the three selected chromosomes. X-linked material with wcp signals were detected twice as often (4.25%) in a MN as that of chromosomes 7 and 18 (2.07% for both). Also, the representation of centromeric signals for chromosome X in MN (2.16%) was higher than for chromosomes 18 (1.24%) and 7 (0.77%). While the frequency of wcp signals in MN is the same for both chromosomes 7 and 18, the frequency of MN containing centromere signals for chromosome 18 is 1.7-times higher than for chromosome 7. We found that only nine of the male MN contained wcp X-positive material, i.e., 0.99%.
Therefore, on the basis of the results obtained in this study, different frequency of involvement of selected chromosomes in MMC-induced MN formation has been demonstrated. It was shown that chromosomes 7, 18 and X with the analogous peripheral localization in the nucleus [12] were involved in the formation of MN with different rates. To answer the question if a correlation is to be suggested for MN formation and the chromosomal position within the interphase nucleus further studies are necessary. In case of a direct correlation of chromosome size and participation in MN formation a distribution, as shown in Figure 2 (red bars), would have to be expected. For chromosomes X (in females) and 18, such a correlation could exist, although we did not observe it for chromosomes 7 and X (in males). Thus, chromosome size could be important but not the single factor for chromosome-specific MN formation. The obvious difference between male- and female-derived MN contained wcp X-positive material (0.99 versus 4.25%) has been established. Even though the dosage of the X-chromosome is only half in male, an additional effect seems to drive a more preferred inclusion of (at least) one X-chromosome in female. Thus, an effect of increased probability of damage of inactive X-chromosome in female has here at least to be discussed (see Figure 2). Finally, MMC-induced MN could involve other chromosomes and/or chromosomal parts than MN induced by other chemicals. Better knowledge of MN formation would enable the use of appropriate FISH probes, and improve the efficiency and value of this test [22].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|