EFFECTS OF SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS IN THE COL1A1 AND METHYLENETETRAHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE GENES ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN IN MALTA
Vidal C1, Brincat M2, Xuereb-Anastasi A1,3*
*Corresponding Author: Professor Angela Xuereb-Anastasi, Ph.D., DNA Laboratory, Department of Pathol­ogy, University of Malta Medical School, G’Mangia, MSD06, Malta; Tel.: +356-25551882; Fax: +356-21235638; E-mail: angela.a.xuereb@um.edu.mt
page: 9

RESULTS

COL1A1 Genotypes. The distributions of the COL1A1 Sp1 and –1997 G→T genotypes in postmenopausal women are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively; both were shown to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p >0.05). Allele frequencies for the Sp1 polymorphism were 65.2% for the S allele and 34.8% for the s, with a heterozygosity rate of 45.6%. The calculated heterozygosity for the –1997 G→T polymorphism was 38.3%, with a frequency of 25.6% for the T and 74.4% for the G allele. Linkage disequilibrium was observed between these two polymorphisms [χ 2 = 12.45; p = 0.01; degrees of freedom (df) = 3] with the combined genotype GG→Ss occurring in 33.6%. When constructing haplotypes, the frequencies of the most common haplotypes were 41.5% for G→S and 23.2% for T→S.

Both polymorphisms in the promoter region of the COL1A1 gene did not show any influence on the LS and FN BMD (Tables 1 and 2). Statistical significance was not reached on tests for genetic models of a dominant or recessive allele (Table 3) or for an allele dose effect by linear regression (p >0.05) (data not shown).

MTHFR C677T Polymorphism. The genotype frequencies for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism observed in postmenopausal women are shown in Table 4. Allele frequencies observed were 63.9% for the C allele and 36.1% for the T, yielding a calculated heterozygosity rate of 46.3%.

The LS, FN, trochanter and Ward’s triangle BMD were lowest in CC homozygotes, although the differences between the genotypes did not reach statistical significance (p >0.05) (Table 4). The C allele was significantly correlated with trochanter BMD and, to a lesser degree, with FN BMD (Table 5). No allele dose effect was observed at any anatomical site for the same allele (p >0.05).

There were no differences in the distribution of genotype frequencies of both COL1A1 polymorphisms between normal postmenopausal women (independent sample t-score >–1.0) and those with a low LS and/or FN BMD when tested by chi-square (p >0.05) (Table 6). Haplotype frequencies were not statistically significant when compared between these two groups (c2 = 1.14; p = 0.76; df = 3) (Table 6). The MTHFR C677T genotype frequencies did not differ significantly between the normal women and those with a low BMD (χ 2 = 0.78; p = 0.68; df = 2) (Table 6).

The MTHFR C677T Frequency in the Maltese Population at Birth. In neonates (n = 245), genotype frequencies for this polymorphism were 46.1% CC, 43.3% CT and 10.6% TT and were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ 2 = 0.02; p = 0.88; df = 1).

 

Table 1. General characteristics, lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in Maltese postmenopausal women according to COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism.

General Characteristics and Genotypes

p Valuea


SS

Ss

ss


SS vs. Ss

SS vs. ss

Ss vs. ss

Number

51

57

14

0.75a




Per cent

41.8

46.7

11.5

–




Age (years)b,c

55.9 (7.2)

55.7 (6.8)

55.3 (8.7)

0.87

0.73

0.63

0.74

BMI (kg/m2)b

28.3 (4.4)

28.7 (4.1)

29.5 (4.5)

0.62

0.60

0.36

0.52

BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.97 (0.22)

0.97

0.96 (0.18)

0.96

0.90 (0.16)

0.89

0.55

0.26

0.85

0.64

0.32

0.11

0.28

0.17

BMD femoral (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.86 (0.14)

0.86

0.83 (0.13)

0.83

0.85 (0.12)

0.84

0.50

0.29

0.25

0.13

0.85

0.58

0.56

0.65

Ward’s Triangle (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedc

0.64 (0.17)

0.64

0.62 (0.14)

0.62

0.64 (0.12)

0.62

0.88

0.59

0.65

0.35

0.98

0.60

0.72

0.97

Trochanter (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.67 (0.14)

0.68

0.69 (0.13)

0.68

0.70 (0.09)

0.68

0.74

0.97

0.55

0.83

0.52

0.91

0.78

0.87

Procollagen (ng/mL)b,c

88.4 (28.0)

93.5 (49.9)

141.8 (100.4)

0.38

0.74

0.29

0.14

DpD (nmol/mmol creatinine)b

9.1 (2.9)

9.1 (3.6)

10.2 (3.3)

0.69

0.96

0.37

0.46

a p Value obtained for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (chi-square).

b Values are means ± SD in parenthesis; p values obtained by ANOVA or independent sample t-test.

c Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney used for age and procollagen.

d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, years since menopause (YSM); 95% confidence interval (CI) given by univariate analysis (not shown).

Table 2. General characteristics, lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in Maltese postmenopausal women according to COL1A1 –1997 G→T polymorphism.

General Characteristics and Genotypes

p Valuea


TT

TG

GG


TT vs. TG

TT vs. GG

TG vs. GG

Number

10

43

70

0.36a




Per cent

8.1

35.0

56.9

–




Age (years)b,c

57.3 (6.1)

55.6 (6.9)

55.5 (7.5)

0.50

0.27

0.25

0.88

BMI (kg/m2)b

27.3 (5.0)

28.9 (4.5)

28.4 (3.9)

0.60

0.38

0.47

0.55

BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.97 (0.16)

1.01

0.97 (0.22)

0.97

0.94 (0.18)

0.94

0.67

0.37

0.98

0.46

0.58

0.24

0.41

0.34

BMD femoral (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.85 (0.15)

0.88

0.85 (0.14)

0.85

0.83 (0.13)

0.83

0.83

0.43

0.91

0.41

0.67

0.24

0.60

0.49

Ward’s Triangle (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedc

0.64 (0.15)

0.69

0.63 (0.16)

0.63

0.62 (0.14)

0.62

0.90

0.45

0.89

0.31

0.72

0.21

0.71

0.75

Trochanter (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.64 (0.15)

0.67

0.68 (0.14)

0.68

0.68 (0.12)

0.67

0.71

096

0.45

0.80

0.46

0.93

0.77

0.83

Procollagen (ng/mL)b,c

88.6 (26.8)

103.9 (86.1)

93.0 (45.4)

0.91

0.85

0.74

0.74

DpD (nmol/mmol creatinine)b

8.3 (2.2)

9.6 (3.4)

9.1 (3.3)

0.66

0.39

0.57

0.57

a p Value obtained for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (chi-square).

b Values are means ± SD in parenthesis; p values obtained by ANOVA or independent sample t-test.

c Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney used for age and procollagen.

d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).

Table 3. Effects of COL1A1 alleles on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women assuming genetic models of a dominant or recessive allele.


Dominant Modela

Recessive Modela

COL1A1 Sp1 Polymorphism

SS

Ss and ss

p Valueb

SS and Ss

ss

p Valueb

Number

49

71

–

106

14

–

BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.97 (0.22)

0.97

0.95 (0.17)

0.94

0.61

0.37

0.96 (0.20)

0.96

0.90 (0.16)

0.89

0.28

0.11

BMD femoral (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.86 (0.14)

0.86

0.83 (0.13)

0.83

0.30

0.13

0.84 (0.14)

0.84

0.85 (0.12)

0.84

0.83

0.98

Ward’s Triangle (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.64 90.17)

0.64

0.62 (0.13)

0.62

0.69

0.31

0.63 (0.15)

0.63

0.64 (0.12)

0.62

0.84

0.79

Trochanter (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.67 (0.14)

0.68

0.69 (0.12)

0.68

0.47

0.83

0.68 (0.13)

0.68

0.70 (0.09)

0.68

0.64

0.94

–1997 TG Polymorphism

TT

TG and GG

p Valueb

TT and TG

GG

p Valueb

Number

10

113

–

53

70

–

BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.97 (0.16)

1.01

0.95 (0.20)

0.95

0.74

0.31

0.97 (0.21)

0.98

0.94 (0.18)

0.94

0.37

0.21

BMD femoral (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.85 (0.15)

0.88

0.84 (0.14)

0.84

0.75

0.28

0.85 (0.14)

0.85

0.83 (0.13)

0.83

0.55

0.30

Ward’s Triangle (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.64 (0.15)

0.69

0.63 (0.15)

0.62

0.78

0.22

0.63 (0.14)

064

0.62 (0.14

0.62

0.66

0.49

Trochanter (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.64 (0.15)

0.67

0.68 (0.13)

0.68

0.44

0.88

0.68 (0.14)

0.68

0.68 (0.12)

0.66

0.96

0.86

a Mean BMD compared between genotype groups assuming hypothesis: A) dominant S or T alleles; B) recessive S or T alleles.

b p Values obtained by unpaired independent sample t-test (two-tailed).

c Values are means ± SD in parenthesis.

d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).

Table 4. General characteristics, lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in Maltese postmenopausal women according to the MTHFR C677T polymorphism.

General Characteristics and Genotypes

p Valuea


CC

CT

TT


CC vs. CT

CC vs. TT

CT vs. TT

Number

49

63

14

0.35a




Per cent

38.9

50.0

11.1

–




Age (years)b,c

56.8 (7.6)

55.7 (6.9)

61.1 (4.4)

0.03

0.51

0.01

0.02

BMI (kg/m2)b

29.2 (4.8)

28.2 (3.6)

28.2 (4.6)

0.46

0.25

0.52

0.98

BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.94 (0.22)

0.94

0.96 (0.18)

0.97

0.97 (0.12)

0.94

0.72

0.57

0.48

0.31

0.57

0.68

0.85

0.66

BMD femoral (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.82 (0.14)

0.82

0.85 (0.13)

0.86

0.89 (0.13)

0.86

0.12

0.14

0.13

0.07

0.08

0.23

0.35

0.87

Ward’s Triangle (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedc

0.60 (0.16)

0.61

0.64 (0.14)

0.64

0.68 (0.09)

0.63

0.25

0.45

0.22

0.24

0.18

0.56

0.43

0.89

Trochanter (g/cm2)b

• Adjustedd

0.65 (0.14)

0.65

0.69 (0.12)

0.69

0.74 (0.08)

0.71

0.10

0.08

0.15

0.04

0.07

0.22

0.19

0.55

Procollagen (ng/mL)b,c

95.1 (28.9)

99.7 (82.6)

82.8 (29.5)

0.21

0.08

0.43

0.88

DpD (nmol/mmol creatinine)b

9.6 (3.6)

8.8 (3.0)

9.3 (3.1)

0.62

0.34

0.87

0.67

a p Value obtained for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (chi-square).

b Values are means ± SD in parenthesis; p values obtained by ANOVA or independent sample t-test; Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney used for age and procollagen.

c Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).

Table 5. Effects of the MTHFR alleles on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women assuming genetic models of a dominant or recessive allele.


Dominant Modela

Recessive Modela

C6776 Polymorphism

CC

CC and TT

p Valueb

CC and CT

TT

p Valueb

Number

47

77

–

110

14

–

BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.94 (0.22)

0.94

0.96 (0.17)

0.96

0.42

0.42

0.95 (0.20)

0.96

0.97 (0.12)

0.93

0.71

0.64

BMD femoral (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.81 (0.14)

0.82

0.86 (0.13)

0.86

0.07

0.05

0.84 (0.14)

0.84

0.89 (0.13)

0.86

0.18

0.49

Ward’s Triangle (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.60 (0.16)

0.61

0.64 (0.14)

0.64

0.14

0.22

0.62 (0.15)

0.63

0.68 (0.09)

0.63

0.29

0.87

Trochanter (g/cm2)c

• Adjustedd

0.65 (0.14)

0.65

0.70 (0.11)

0.70

0.07

0.03

0.67 (0.13)

0.67

0.74 (0.08)

0.71

0.12

0.33

a Mean BMD compared between genotype groups assuming hypothesis: A) dominant C allele; B) recessive C allele.

b p Values obtained by unpaired independent sample t-test (two-tailed).

c Values are means ± SD in parenthesis.

d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).

Table 6. Genotype and haplotype frequencies (%) in normal postmenopausal women and women having a low bone mineral density.

Normal

Low

BMD

p Valuea

COL1A1 Sp1

• SS

• Ss

• ss

46.9

42.9

10.2

36.6

50.7

12.7

 

0.53

COL1A1 –1997 GT

• TT

• TG

• GG

10.0

36.0

54.0

5.6

33.8

60.6

0.60

MTHFR

• CC

• CT

• TT

33.3

54.9

11.8

41.1

47.9

11.0

0.68

COL1A1 Haplotype

• T/S

• G/S

• T/s

• G/s

25.6

42.1

1.5

30.8

21.0

40.6

2.2

36.2

0.76

a p Values obtained by the chi-squared test.

 





Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006