
EFFECTS OF SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS IN THE
COL1A1 AND METHYLENETETRAHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE GENES
ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN IN MALTA
Vidal C1, Brincat M2, Xuereb-Anastasi A1,3*
*Corresponding Author: Professor Angela Xuereb-Anastasi, Ph.D., DNA Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Malta Medical School, GMangia, MSD06, Malta; Tel.: +356-25551882; Fax: +356-21235638; E-mail: angela.a.xuereb@um.edu.mt
page: 9
|
RESULTS
COL1A1 Genotypes. The distributions of the COL1A1 Sp1 and 1997 G→T genotypes in postmenopausal women are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively; both were shown to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p >0.05). Allele frequencies for the Sp1 polymorphism were 65.2% for the S allele and 34.8% for the s, with a heterozygosity rate of 45.6%. The calculated heterozygosity for the 1997 G→T polymorphism was 38.3%, with a frequency of 25.6% for the T and 74.4% for the G allele. Linkage disequilibrium was observed between these two polymorphisms [χ 2 = 12.45; p = 0.01; degrees of freedom (df) = 3] with the combined genotype GG→Ss occurring in 33.6%. When constructing haplotypes, the frequencies of the most common haplotypes were 41.5% for G→S and 23.2% for T→S.
Both polymorphisms in the promoter region of the COL1A1 gene did not show any influence on the LS and FN BMD (Tables 1 and 2). Statistical significance was not reached on tests for genetic models of a dominant or recessive allele (Table 3) or for an allele dose effect by linear regression (p >0.05) (data not shown).
MTHFR C677T Polymorphism. The genotype frequencies for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism observed in postmenopausal women are shown in Table 4. Allele frequencies observed were 63.9% for the C allele and 36.1% for the T, yielding a calculated heterozygosity rate of 46.3%.
The LS, FN, trochanter and Wards triangle BMD were lowest in CC homozygotes, although the differences between the genotypes did not reach statistical significance (p >0.05) (Table 4). The C allele was significantly correlated with trochanter BMD and, to a lesser degree, with FN BMD (Table 5). No allele dose effect was observed at any anatomical site for the same allele (p >0.05).
There were no differences in the distribution of genotype frequencies of both COL1A1 polymorphisms between normal postmenopausal women (independent sample t-score >1.0) and those with a low LS and/or FN BMD when tested by chi-square (p >0.05) (Table 6). Haplotype frequencies were not statistically significant when compared between these two groups (c2 = 1.14; p = 0.76; df = 3) (Table 6). The MTHFR C677T genotype frequencies did not differ significantly between the normal women and those with a low BMD (χ 2 = 0.78; p = 0.68; df = 2) (Table 6).
The MTHFR C677T Frequency in the Maltese Population at Birth. In neonates (n = 245), genotype frequencies for this polymorphism were 46.1% CC, 43.3% CT and 10.6% TT and were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ 2 = 0.02; p = 0.88; df = 1).
Table 1. General characteristics, lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in Maltese postmenopausal women according to COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism.
-
General Characteristics and Genotypes |
p Valuea |
|
SS |
Ss |
ss |
|
SS vs. Ss |
SS vs. ss |
Ss vs. ss |
Number |
51 |
57 |
14 |
0.75a |
|
|
|
Per cent |
41.8 |
46.7 |
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
Age (years)b,c |
55.9 (7.2) |
55.7 (6.8) |
55.3 (8.7) |
0.87 |
0.73 |
0.63 |
0.74 |
BMI (kg/m2)b |
28.3 (4.4) |
28.7 (4.1) |
29.5 (4.5) |
0.62 |
0.60 |
0.36 |
0.52 |
BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.97 (0.22)
0.97 |
0.96 (0.18)
0.96 |
0.90 (0.16)
0.89 |
0.55
0.26 |
0.85
0.64 |
0.32
0.11 |
0.28
0.17 |
BMD femoral (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.86 (0.14)
0.86 |
0.83 (0.13)
0.83 |
0.85 (0.12)
0.84 |
0.50
0.29 |
0.25
0.13 |
0.85
0.58 |
0.56
0.65 |
Wards Triangle (g/cm2)b
Adjustedc |
0.64 (0.17)
0.64 |
0.62 (0.14)
0.62 |
0.64 (0.12)
0.62 |
0.88
0.59 |
0.65
0.35 |
0.98
0.60 |
0.72
0.97 |
Trochanter (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.67 (0.14)
0.68 |
0.69 (0.13)
0.68 |
0.70 (0.09)
0.68 |
0.74
0.97 |
0.55
0.83 |
0.52
0.91 |
0.78
0.87 |
Procollagen (ng/mL)b,c |
88.4 (28.0) |
93.5 (49.9) |
141.8 (100.4) |
0.38 |
0.74 |
0.29 |
0.14 |
DpD (nmol/mmol creatinine)b |
9.1 (2.9) |
9.1 (3.6) |
10.2 (3.3) |
0.69 |
0.96 |
0.37 |
0.46 |
a p Value obtained for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (chi-square).
b Values are means ± SD in parenthesis; p values obtained by ANOVA or independent sample t-test.
c Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney used for age and procollagen.
d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, years since menopause (YSM); 95% confidence interval (CI) given by univariate analysis (not shown).
Table 2. General characteristics, lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in Maltese postmenopausal women according to COL1A1 1997 G→T polymorphism.
-
General Characteristics and Genotypes |
p Valuea |
|
TT |
TG |
GG |
|
TT vs. TG |
TT vs. GG |
TG vs. GG |
Number |
10 |
43 |
70 |
0.36a |
|
|
|
Per cent |
8.1 |
35.0 |
56.9 |
|
|
|
|
Age (years)b,c |
57.3 (6.1) |
55.6 (6.9) |
55.5 (7.5) |
0.50 |
0.27 |
0.25 |
0.88 |
BMI (kg/m2)b |
27.3 (5.0) |
28.9 (4.5) |
28.4 (3.9) |
0.60 |
0.38 |
0.47 |
0.55 |
BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.97 (0.16)
1.01 |
0.97 (0.22)
0.97 |
0.94 (0.18)
0.94 |
0.67
0.37 |
0.98
0.46 |
0.58
0.24 |
0.41
0.34 |
BMD femoral (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.85 (0.15)
0.88 |
0.85 (0.14)
0.85 |
0.83 (0.13)
0.83 |
0.83
0.43 |
0.91
0.41 |
0.67
0.24 |
0.60
0.49 |
Wards Triangle (g/cm2)b
Adjustedc |
0.64 (0.15)
0.69 |
0.63 (0.16)
0.63 |
0.62 (0.14)
0.62 |
0.90
0.45 |
0.89
0.31 |
0.72
0.21 |
0.71
0.75 |
Trochanter (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.64 (0.15)
0.67 |
0.68 (0.14)
0.68 |
0.68 (0.12)
0.67 |
0.71
096 |
0.45
0.80 |
0.46
0.93 |
0.77
0.83 |
Procollagen (ng/mL)b,c |
88.6 (26.8) |
103.9 (86.1) |
93.0 (45.4) |
0.91 |
0.85 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
DpD (nmol/mmol creatinine)b |
8.3 (2.2) |
9.6 (3.4) |
9.1 (3.3) |
0.66 |
0.39 |
0.57 |
0.57 |
-
a p Value obtained for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (chi-square).
b Values are means ± SD in parenthesis; p values obtained by ANOVA or independent sample t-test.
c Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney used for age and procollagen.
d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).
Table 3. Effects of COL1A1 alleles on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women assuming genetic models of a dominant or recessive allele.
-
|
Dominant Modela |
Recessive Modela |
COL1A1 Sp1 Polymorphism |
SS |
Ss and ss |
p Valueb |
SS and Ss |
ss |
p Valueb |
Number |
49 |
71 |
|
106 |
14 |
|
BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.97 (0.22)
0.97 |
0.95 (0.17)
0.94 |
0.61
0.37 |
0.96 (0.20)
0.96 |
0.90 (0.16)
0.89 |
0.28
0.11 |
BMD femoral (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.86 (0.14)
0.86 |
0.83 (0.13)
0.83 |
0.30
0.13 |
0.84 (0.14)
0.84 |
0.85 (0.12)
0.84 |
0.83
0.98 |
Wards Triangle (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.64 90.17)
0.64 |
0.62 (0.13)
0.62 |
0.69
0.31 |
0.63 (0.15)
0.63 |
0.64 (0.12)
0.62 |
0.84
0.79 |
Trochanter (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.67 (0.14)
0.68 |
0.69 (0.12)
0.68 |
0.47
0.83 |
0.68 (0.13)
0.68 |
0.70 (0.09)
0.68 |
0.64
0.94 |
1997 T→G Polymorphism |
TT |
TG and GG |
p Valueb |
TT and TG |
GG |
p Valueb |
Number |
10 |
113 |
|
53 |
70 |
|
BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.97 (0.16)
1.01 |
0.95 (0.20)
0.95 |
0.74
0.31 |
0.97 (0.21)
0.98 |
0.94 (0.18)
0.94 |
0.37
0.21 |
BMD femoral (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.85 (0.15)
0.88 |
0.84 (0.14)
0.84 |
0.75
0.28 |
0.85 (0.14)
0.85 |
0.83 (0.13)
0.83 |
0.55
0.30 |
Wards Triangle (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.64 (0.15)
0.69 |
0.63 (0.15)
0.62 |
0.78
0.22 |
0.63 (0.14)
064 |
0.62 (0.14
0.62 |
0.66
0.49 |
Trochanter (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.64 (0.15)
0.67 |
0.68 (0.13)
0.68 |
0.44
0.88 |
0.68 (0.14)
0.68 |
0.68 (0.12)
0.66 |
0.96
0.86 |
a Mean BMD compared between genotype groups assuming hypothesis: A) dominant S or T alleles; B) recessive S or T alleles.
b p Values obtained by unpaired independent sample t-test (two-tailed).
c Values are means ± SD in parenthesis.
d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).
Table 4. General characteristics, lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in Maltese postmenopausal women according to the MTHFR C677T polymorphism.
-
General Characteristics and Genotypes |
p Valuea |
|
CC |
CT |
TT |
|
CC vs. CT |
CC vs. TT |
CT vs. TT |
Number |
49 |
63 |
14 |
0.35a |
|
|
|
Per cent |
38.9 |
50.0 |
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
Age (years)b,c |
56.8 (7.6) |
55.7 (6.9) |
61.1 (4.4) |
0.03 |
0.51 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
BMI (kg/m2)b |
29.2 (4.8) |
28.2 (3.6) |
28.2 (4.6) |
0.46 |
0.25 |
0.52 |
0.98 |
BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.94 (0.22)
0.94 |
0.96 (0.18)
0.97 |
0.97 (0.12)
0.94 |
0.72
0.57 |
0.48
0.31 |
0.57
0.68 |
0.85
0.66 |
BMD femoral (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.82 (0.14)
0.82 |
0.85 (0.13)
0.86 |
0.89 (0.13)
0.86 |
0.12
0.14 |
0.13
0.07 |
0.08
0.23 |
0.35
0.87 |
Wards Triangle (g/cm2)b
Adjustedc |
0.60 (0.16)
0.61 |
0.64 (0.14)
0.64 |
0.68 (0.09)
0.63 |
0.25
0.45 |
0.22
0.24 |
0.18
0.56 |
0.43
0.89 |
Trochanter (g/cm2)b
Adjustedd |
0.65 (0.14)
0.65 |
0.69 (0.12)
0.69 |
0.74 (0.08)
0.71 |
0.10
0.08 |
0.15
0.04 |
0.07
0.22 |
0.19
0.55 |
Procollagen (ng/mL)b,c |
95.1 (28.9) |
99.7 (82.6) |
82.8 (29.5) |
0.21 |
0.08 |
0.43 |
0.88 |
DpD (nmol/mmol creatinine)b |
9.6 (3.6) |
8.8 (3.0) |
9.3 (3.1) |
0.62 |
0.34 |
0.87 |
0.67 |
a p Value obtained for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (chi-square).
b Values are means ± SD in parenthesis; p values obtained by ANOVA or independent sample t-test; Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney used for age and procollagen.
c Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).
Table 5. Effects of the MTHFR alleles on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women assuming genetic models of a dominant or recessive allele.
-
|
Dominant Modela |
Recessive Modela |
C6776 Polymorphism |
CC |
CC and TT |
p Valueb |
CC and CT |
TT |
p Valueb |
Number |
47 |
77 |
|
110 |
14 |
|
BMD L2-L4 (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.94 (0.22)
0.94 |
0.96 (0.17)
0.96 |
0.42
0.42 |
0.95 (0.20)
0.96 |
0.97 (0.12)
0.93 |
0.71
0.64 |
BMD femoral (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.81 (0.14)
0.82 |
0.86 (0.13)
0.86 |
0.07
0.05 |
0.84 (0.14)
0.84 |
0.89 (0.13)
0.86 |
0.18
0.49 |
Wards Triangle (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.60 (0.16)
0.61 |
0.64 (0.14)
0.64 |
0.14
0.22 |
0.62 (0.15)
0.63 |
0.68 (0.09)
0.63 |
0.29
0.87 |
Trochanter (g/cm2)c
Adjustedd |
0.65 (0.14)
0.65 |
0.70 (0.11)
0.70 |
0.07
0.03 |
0.67 (0.13)
0.67 |
0.74 (0.08)
0.71 |
0.12
0.33 |
-
-
a Mean BMD compared between genotype groups assuming hypothesis: A) dominant C allele; B) recessive C allele.
b p Values obtained by unpaired independent sample t-test (two-tailed).
c Values are means ± SD in parenthesis.
d Values are adjusted for age, BMI, YSM; 95% CI given by univariate analysis (not shown).
-
Table 6. Genotype and haplotype frequencies (%) in normal postmenopausal women and women having a low bone mineral density.
-
|
Normal |
Low
BMD |
p Valuea |
COL1A1 Sp1
SS
Ss
ss |
46.9
42.9
10.2 |
36.6
50.7
12.7 |
0.53 |
COL1A1 1997 G→T
TT
TG
GG |
10.0
36.0
54.0 |
5.6
33.8
60.6 |
0.60 |
MTHFR
CC
CT
TT |
33.3
54.9
11.8 |
41.1
47.9
11.0 |
0.68 |
COL1A1 Haplotype
T/S
G/S
T/s
G/s |
25.6
42.1
1.5
30.8 |
21.0
40.6
2.2
36.2 |
0.76 |
-
a p Values obtained by the chi-squared test.
-
-
-
-
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|