UPDATED MODELING PARAMETERS FOR DOWN’S SYNDROME SCREENING
Cuckle HS*
*Corresponding Author: Professor Howard S. Cuckle, Reproductive Epidemiology, University of Leeds, 3 Gemini Park, Sheepscar Way, Leeds LS7 3JB, North Yorkshire, UK; Tel.: +44-113-284-9230; Fax: +44-113-262-1658; E-mail: h.s.cuckle@leeds.ac.uk
page: 101

RESULTS

Table 1 shows for each individual publication the DS mean for second trimester inhibin and the log10 SD in both affected and unaffected pregnancies. The overall DS mean based on 603 pregnancies is 1.85 MoM with 95% confi­dence interval (CI) 1.74-1.96 MoM. The overall differ­ence in variance between affected and unaffected preg­nancies is 0.0252.

Most of these studies did not report data that could be used to calculate covariances, so direct estimates of the R-values were used instead. Table 2 shows the available individual estimates; the weighted mean values in DS and unaffected pregnancies were: freehCG 0.37 and 0.32; hCG 0.44 and 0.38; AFP 0.08 and 0.16; uE3 –0.13 and 0.01.

Similarly, there was insufficient data to estimate the difference in covariance for first trimester PAPP-A and second trimester serum markers. Table 3 shows the the available individual estimates; there was only one esti­mate for DS pregnancies and the weighted mean values in unaffected pregnancies were: free-β hCG 0.14, hCG 0.12, AFP 0.06, uE3 0.16 and inhibin 0.07.

Table 4 shows for each NT publication the DS mean and the log10 SD in DS and unaffected pregnancies. The overall DS mean based on 703 pregnancies is 2.03 MoM (95% CI 1.93-2.14 MoM). The overall difference in vari­ance between affected and unaffected pregnancies is 0.0419. No correlation with serum markers has been found in any study.

The parameters for the individual NF studies are also shown in Table 4. The DS mean based on 234 pregnancies is 1.45 MoM (95% CI 1.34-1.57 MoM). The unaffected variance was only available for one study, so the DS SD was estimated directly as 0.2067. No consistent correla­tion was found with serum markers except for second tri­mester hCG in DS pregnancies. Since two of the studies found a strong association [34,35], the mean value of 0.37 was used for both hCG and or free-β hCG, which had not been tested in any of the studies.


Table 5 shows model predicted screening performance for different marker combinations. The addition of inhibin to three marker second trimester serum screening policies increases the detection rate for a 5% FPR by about 6%. Ultrasound NT alone at 11-13 weeks has a DR about 4% higher than the best second trimester serum only combina­tion. The addition to NT to first trimester serum combina­tions of two and four markers at 10 and 13 weeks increases detection by about 12-14%. A similar increase was found at 11 and 12 weeks (not shown). The NF is a poorer marker than NT but it’s use in addition to the best four marker second trimester serum screening combination increases detection by 10%. Adding first trimester PAPP-A at 10 and 13 weeks to second trimester serum screening increases detection by about 4-9%. The addition of NT to this two sample policy increases detection by 13-16%, about 1-3% higher than the best first trimester NT combi­nation. The addition of NF to the best second trimester serum screening policy increases detection by about 7-9%.

 

 

Table 1. Second trimester inhibin: means (MoM) and standard deviations (SD) (log10 MoM)




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006