
UNIPARENTAL DISOMY (UPD): A CONSEQUENCE
OF NON-DISJUNCTION AND THE IMPLICATIONS
IN PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Velissariou V* *Corresponding Author: Dr. Voula Velissariou, Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Mitera Hospital, Erythrou Stavrou 7, Maroussi, Athens 11523, Greece; Tel.: +30-210-686-9869; Fax: +30-210-689-9476; E-mail: voulavel@ hol.gr page: 55
|
TYPES AND FORMATION OF UNIPARENTAL DISOMY
Complete UPD. In complete UPD, both members of a homologous pair come from the one parent. It usually follows restoration of diploidy in an initially trisomic conceptus [6), a phenomenon known as “trisomy rescue”. Possible mechanisms of UPD are listed in Table 1. It should be emphasized that a minimum of two events, occurring independently of each other, is always necessary to produce UPD, either both meiotic, or one meiotic and the other mitotic, or both mitotic. This also holds true for cases with isolated UPD in connection with rare chromosome aberrations such as isochromosomes or Robertsonian translocations [7].
Uniparental disomy for the entire chromosome set, “uniparental diploidy”, has a devastating effect on development. If a conceptus has lost its maternal complement, and the paternal complement doubles in an attempt to compensate, no embryo at all forms, and the chorionic villi are grossly abnormal. This is a hydatidiform mole. If an ovum attempts a parthenogenetic development, a grossly disorganized mass of embryonic tissue results: an ovarian teratoma [8].
Segmental UPD. Segmental UPD is caused by somatic recombination, when the segments exchanged are in a region subject to imprinting and this leads to functional imbalance (Fig. 1). The only example of this causing a dysmorphic syndrome known at present is the segmental paternal UPD for 11p of some Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), 11p being a segment that is normally maternally imprinted. In the partial UPD cell line, this segment will now be expressing bi-allelically at distal 11p. The asymmetry of body growth in this syndrome may reflect mosaicism of two tissue types: tissue descendant from the original genotype and tissue descendant from the cell in which the segmental UPD arose [9,10].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|