
EXOGENOUS AND ENDOGENOUS RISK FACTORS FOR
MATERNAL NON-DISJUNCTION OF CHROMOSOME 21
Sperling K1,* Pelz J2 *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Karl Sperling, Charité, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Institut fuer Humangenetik, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Tel.: +49-30-450-66081; Fax: +49-30-45-66904; E-mail: karl.sperling@charite.de page: 5
|
CONCLUSIONS
If one takes into account that the prevalence of aneuploidies is more than an order of magnitude higher in man than in the mouse, extrapolation from mouse-to-human with respect to the induction of non-disjunction poses a fundamental problem. Thus, there is a need for epidemiological studies in man with respect to environmental hazards that might influence the rate of non-disjunction or the identification of women with a higher risk for the development of aneuploid gametes.
For reasons of efficiency (time and money), it is generally desirable to use existing databases. An enormous number of subjects affected with trisomy 21 is continuously detected due to the extensive use of prenatal diagnosis programs. In addition, in several countries all tentative diagnoses of DS in the newborn or infancy period, are confirmed by cytogenetic analyses. These diagnoses can be used as a basis for a case-control surveillance program. The relevant history of the mothers of these cases can be obtained with little extra effort; the challenge for the operation of such a system is to obtain the co-operation of healthy controls. The interviews must be conducted by trained interviewers as personal interviews with a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire should include socio-demographics, family history of the woman and her partner, gynecological, obstetric and general medical history, life style (including smoking, alcohol, drugs), previous X-rays and work-place history, so that all suspected confounders and risk factors are covered.
We have shown the feasibility of such an approach and interviewed 50 mothers, who gave birth to a child with trisomy 21, and 272 controls. Since the probability of receiving a particular X-ray investigation increases with age, the analysis was stratified using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The highest (and significant) odds ratios were for thyroid scans, and for X-ray investigations of the pelvis and the abdomen [26]. This is in line with the BEIR V (Committee on the Biological Effects on Ionizing Radiation) report on the effects of low dose radiation on non-disjunction in humans. The authors conclude that nine out of 13 studies show a positive, and only two a negative effect [27].
In conclusion, there is an urgent need for epidemiological studies of trisomy 21. This is essential from a public health perspective under the aspect of risk avoidance and primary prevention. Knowledge of potential hazards is a prerequisite for the practitioner or clinician who counsels and takes care of pregnant women according to the rules of good clinical practice.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|