
GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO PRE-ECLAMPSIA:
POLYMORPHISM OF GENES INVOLVED IN
REGULATION OF ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTIONS
Mozgovaia EV, Malysheva OV, Ivashchenko TE, Baranov VS* *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Vladislav S. Baranov, Laboratory of Prenatal Diagnosis of Inherited Disorders, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Mendeleevskaya line 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia; Tel/Fax: +07-812-328-0487; E-mail: baranov@vb2475. spb.edu page: 19
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We examined 122 pregnant women with PE and 73 pregnant women without obvious somatic pathology (control group), who were under supervision at the Ott’s Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Petersburg, Russia. The group of patients was non uniform in severity of PE and in the presence of accompanying background diseases. Forty-six patients did not manifest any accompanying pathology (pure PE), with 31 having mild PE (nephropathia I-II) and 15 having severe PE (nephropathia III and real PE). Combined PE was diagnosed in 76 patients. Previous arterial hypertension (AH) was recorded in 49 patients (27 with AH I-II and 22 with AH III), kidney disease in 16 and diabetes mellitus in 19.
Genetic Analysis. The relevant polymorphic sites and oligoprimers used for analysis of PLAT, PAI-1, eNOS, ACE, TNF-a and GSTP1 are summarized in Fig. 1. DNA extracted from fresh blood was subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification in a Perkin-Elmer Cetus thermocycler (Norwalk, CT, USA). The products of the PCR amplification were cut with endonucleases such as Bsc4I (PAI-1), Msp1 (TNF-a), BsoMA 1 and BstFN1 (GSTP1) according to the conditions and buffers recommended by the manufacturer (Bion, Moscow, Russia). Restriction products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 7.0 % polyacrylamide gel, stained with ethidium bromide, visualized under an UV light and scored with the video system of Wilber Laurmant (France).
Statistical Analysis. A standard chi-square test (c2) was used for comparison of genotype frequencies. Relative risk (OR) of disease development for a certain genotype was determined from the standard formula: OR = a/b*d/c, where a and b are the number of patients with illness, having and not having a mutant genotype respectively, c and d are the number of persons in the control group, having and not having a mutant genotype respectively. We considered values of OR >1 as a risk factor for development of the given pathology, and OR <1 as a protecting factor.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|