
COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION STUDY OF INVASIVE TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMAS OF THE URINARY BLADDER OF BULGARIAN PATIENTS Zaharieva B1, Damianov Ch2, Tabakov V2, Tzingilev B2, Nikolov I1, Georgiev Ch3, Toncheva D1 *Corresponding Author: Toncheva D.
Department of Medical Genetics,
Medical University Sofia,
2 Zdrave str,
1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
Tel/Fax: + 359 2 9520357
email: draga@spnet.net
page: 31
|
RESULTS
CGH and tumor stage
The total number of aberrations in all tumors studied (pT1-4) ranged from 0 to 20 per case (mean, 4.19). Gains (range, 0-13; mean, 3.58) were more frequent than deletions (range, 0-7; mean, 0.62)(Table 1). Eight tumors had no detectable aberrations. Two tumors had single aberrations (7q+ and 9q+ respectively).
Stage pT1. pT1 tumors had an average number of 3.25 aberrations per case, ranging from 0 to 9). There were 0.13 deletions (range, 0-2) and 3.13 gains (range, 0-9). Seven out of 16 tumors (43.75%) had no detectable aberrations. No tumor showed a single aberration. No deletion was repeatedly found. Gain at 3q was the most frequent aberration (25%)(Table 2). Gains at 1q and 8q were found in 3 tumors (18.75%), while repeatedly in two tumors were gains at 2p, 2q, 3p, 6p, 6q, 8p, 10q, 12p, 12q, 16q, and 17q (12.5%). All aberrations of pT1 tumors are summarized in Fig. 1.
Stage pT2-4. pT2-4 tumors had higher number of aberrations than pT1 tumors (mean, 5.7; range 0-20). On average there were 1.4 deletions (range, 0-7) and 4.3 gains (range, 0-13). One tumor had no detectable aberrations (10%). Two tumors showed only one aberration (7q+ and 9q+ respectively). Repeatedly found aberrations were 17q+ (50%), 20q+ (40%), 5p+ (30%), 7q+ (30%), 15q+ (30%), 16q+ (30%), 9p- (20%), 3q+ (20%), 7p+ (20%), 12q+ (20%), and 20p+ (20%). All aberrations of pT2-4 tumors are summarized in Tables 1, 2 and Fig. 2.
Neither the total number of aberrations nor separately the number of deletions and gains reached statistically significant differences between pT1 and pT2-4 tumors (P=0.2030, P=0.0610, P=0.4350), although there was a trend towards increased genomic instability in muscle-invasive compared to minimally invasive bladder cancers. Most clear was the trend concerning the frequencies of deletions.
There was no significant difference between losses of none of the chromosomal regions. Gains at 5p and 20p were not found in pT1 tumors whereas they were repeatedly found in pT2-4 tumors (P=0.0198 and P=0.0626). The frequency of gains at 17q and 20q significantly increased in pT2-4 tumors compared to pT1 (P=0.0360 and P=0.0336). Summary of the results on affected chromosomal regions and tumor stage are shown in Table 2.
Table 1. Number of aberrations and tumor stage
Tumor stage |
No. |
Deletions a |
Gains a |
Total number of aberrations a |
pT1 |
16 |
0.13 ± 0.50 |
3.13 ± 3.59 |
3.25 ± 3.59 |
pT2-4 |
10 |
1.40 ± 2.55b |
4.30 ± 3.80c |
5.70 ± 6.00d |
Total |
26 |
0.62 ± 1.70 |
3.58 ± 3.65 |
4.19 ± 4.71 |
a Aberrations per tumor (mean±SD) b P=0.0610 c P=0.4350 d P=0.2030
CGH and tumor grade
The number of aberrations increased from grade 2 to grade 3 tumors (mean, 4.22; range, 0-20 for G2; and mean, 4.71; range, 0-10 for G3)(Table 3). The trend concerned both deletion and gains’ rate. However, the differences between G2 and G3 tumors were not significant neither in the number of deletions (P=0.8970) and gains (P=0.8410), nor in the total number of chromosomal aberrations (P=0.8210).
Table 2. Specific genomic alterations and tumor stage
Type of aberration |
Locus |
pT1 (Total n=16) n (%) |
pT2-4 (Total n=10) n (%) |
pa |
Deletion |
3q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
4q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1972 |
|
5p |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1973 |
|
6p |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1974 |
|
6q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1975 |
|
9p |
1 (6.25%) |
2 (20%) |
0.2856 |
|
9q |
1 (6.25%) |
1 (10%) |
0.7269 |
|
10q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
11p |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
12p |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
16q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
Gain |
1q |
3 (18.75%) |
0 (0%) |
0.1454 |
|
2p |
2 (12.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.2446 |
|
2q |
2 (12.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.2446 |
|
3p |
2 (12.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.2446 |
|
3q |
4 (25.0%) |
2 (20%) |
0.7680 |
|
4q |
1 (6.25%) |
0 (0%) |
0.4201 |
|
5p |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
0.0198b |
|
5q |
1 (6.25%) |
0 (0%) |
0.4201 |
|
6p |
2 (12.5%) |
1 (10%) |
0.8454 |
|
6q |
2 (12.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.2446 |
|
7p |
1 (6.25%) |
2 (20%) |
0.2856 |
|
7q |
1 (6.25%) |
3 (30%) |
0.1025 |
|
8p |
2 (12.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.2446 |
|
8q |
3 (18.75%) |
1 (10%) |
0.5474 |
|
9p |
1 (6.25%) |
0 (0%) |
0.4201 |
|
9q |
1 (6.25%) |
1 (10%) |
0.7269 |
|
10q |
2 (12.5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.2446 |
|
11p |
1 (6.25%) |
0 (0%) |
0.4201 |
|
11q |
2 (12.5%) |
1 (10%) |
0.8454 |
|
12p |
2 (12.5%) |
1 (10%) |
0.8454 |
|
12q |
2 (12.5%) |
2 (20%) |
0.6060 |
|
13q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
14q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
15q |
1 (6.25%) |
3 (30%) |
0.1025 |
|
16q |
2 (12.5%) |
3 (30%) |
0.2707 |
|
17p |
1 (6.25%) |
0 (0%) |
0.4201 |
|
17q |
2 (12.5%) |
5 (50%) |
0.0360 |
|
18p |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
18q |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0.1971 |
|
20p |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
0.0626 |
|
20q |
1 (6.25%) |
4 (40%) |
0.0336 |
|
21q |
1 (6.25%) |
1 (10%) |
0.7269 |
a λ2 test
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|