
A RAPID METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF ALLELIC IMBALANCE OF THE LONG ARM OF CHROMOSOME 18 IN COLORECTAL CANCER Stefanovska A-M1*, Jasar D2*, Zografski G2, Josifovski T3, Panovski M3, Efremov GD1, Dimovski AJ1 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Aleksandar J. Dimovski, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aven. Krste Misirkov 2, POB 428,1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia;
Tel: +3892-120253; Fax: +3892-115434; E-mail: aleks@amanu.edu.mk
page: 21
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Determination of chromosome 18q status. Loss of a chromosome 18q allele in a tumor was considered to be present when the relative intensity of the two alleles in the tumor DNA differed from the relative intensity in the normal tissue DNA by ±35%. MSI (microsatellite instability) tumors, in which abnormal size PCR fragments were obtained, were included among the tumors with no loss. The cut off was set at 35% after the verification of the procedure performed by mixing two homozygotes for two different alleles for each marker in varying concentrations (100%, 90%, 75%, 60%, 50%, 40%, 25%, 10%, 0%) (data not shown).
Evaluation of assays and assessment of 18q allelic loss frequency.The results of the 18q LOH analysis obtained by the conventional PCR/PAGE method and the multiplex fluorescent PCR are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The results obtained by the two methods were in complete agreement for all analyzed patients (data not shown). Due to its simplicity, speed, reproducibility and lesser manipulation requirements, the automated fluorescent multiplex PCR analysis is a method of choice for a routine diagnosis of allelic imbalances of clinical relevance.
.jpg)
Figure 1. Autoradiographs showing the detection of an allelic imbalance (LOH), normal (-) and non-informative (NI) results at D18S61 and DCC loci using the PCR/PAGE method. T&N - tumor and normal tissue from each patient, respectively.
Loss of heterozygosity at 18q was present in 31 of 92 (34%) analyzed cancers. This figure is slightly lower compared to the reports of other studies, ranging from 43% to 53% [18-20]. The discrepancy could be explained by the fact that our group consisted mainly of lower staged tumors (18 tumors-stages A and B vs. 13 tumors-stage C). Allelic loss in all the markers, i.e. total loss of chromosome 18q was detected in 29 out of 31 (93.5%) tumors. In one tumor (3.2%) partial loss of telomere markers D18S58 and D18S61 was detected and distal loss of the 18q tip (D18S58) was also present in one (3.2%) tumor. These two patients and their tumors did not differ in any way from the rest of the patients with 18q allelic imbalance of their tumors.
Association of 18q loss with some features of patients and tumors. The association of 18q allelic loss with several clinical and histopathological features in tumors of 92 colorectal cancer patients included in this study is shown in Table 3. Loss of heterozygosity at 18q was not associated neither with gender and age of the patients, nor with histotype and Dukes' stage of tumors. Association of 18q imbalance with left sided localization of tumors was with a border line significance. The prognostic significance of 18q imbalance on relapse of the disease, disese free survival and total survival is currently being evaluated in a prospective study of over 100 colorectal cancer patients and will be reported upon its completion.
.jpg)
Figure 2. Chromatograms identifying the allelic imbalance in three colorectal cancers at D18S46, D18S535 and D18S61 loci using the fluorescent multiplex PCR/capillary electrophoresis method. T&N - tumor and normal tissue from each patient, respectively.
For D18S46 and D18S61 markers thr deletion of 18q is clearly evident, while for D18S535 marker the ratio between the tumor and normal tissue is 1 : 1.7.
Table 2.Association of loss of heterozygosity at 18q with some clinical features of the patients and histopathological features of the tumors
Features |
No. |
18q LOH |
p |
No. % |
Gender |
|
|
|
male |
57 |
23 40.4 |
0.1126 |
female |
35 |
8 22.9 |
Age |
|
|
|
< 60 years |
28 |
10 35.7 |
0.8138 |
> 60 years |
64 |
21 32.8 |
Localization |
|
|
|
rightsided |
26 |
5 19.2 |
0.0654 |
leftsided |
66 |
26 39.4 |
Histopatological type |
|
|
|
mucinose |
17 |
4 23.5 |
0.4034 |
others |
75 |
27 36.0 |
Dukes stage |
|
|
|
A |
13 |
4 30.8 |
0.6878 |
B |
46 |
14 30.4 |
C |
33 |
13 39.4 |
Total
|
|
31 33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|