
G870A POLYMORPHISM IN THE CYCLIN D1 GENE
IN COLORECTAL CANCER
Stefanovska A-M1, Josifovski T2, Panovski M2, Jasar D3, Zografski G3,
Popevska Z4, Efremov GD1, Dimovski AJ1,*
*Corresponding Author: : Dr. Aleksandar J. Dimovski, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Av. Krste Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel: +3892-120253; Fax: +3892-115434; E-mail: aleks@manu.edu.mk
*Current address: Faculty of Pharmacy, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel: +3892 119694; FAX: + 3892 123054; E-mail: adimovski@baba.ff.ukim.edu.mk
page: 27
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Patient and control subjects were found to have similar allelic frequencies of the CCND1 polymorphism (A allele 0.54 for patients and 0.51 for controls; p = 0.47) and genotypes distribution (AA 32%, AG 44%, GG 24% for patients and AA 25%, AG 51%, GG 24% for controls; p = 0.47) (Table 1). Allelic frequencies (A allele 0.54) and genotype distribution (AA 36%, AG 36%, GG 28%) of patients who were less than 60 years of age also did not differ from those of the controls (p = 0.65 and p = 0.19, respectively).
Age and gender of patients, as well as localization or the Dukes' stage of tumors, did not influence the allelic frequencies and genotype distribution of the CCND1 polymorphism (p >0.1 in all instances). Although the number of patients was small, a statistically significant difference in CCND1 polymorphism frequencies was found when patients less than 60 years of age were analyzed in relation to the MSI status of their tumors (Table 2). Comparison of the distribution of AA and AG genotypes in this group of patients suggested that the A allele acts as a dominant trait [Odds Ratio 4.69, 95% Confidance Interval 1.02-21.54, p = 0.046].
Our data indicate that the CCND1 polymorphism may influence the age at onset of colorectal cancer in young patients only when their tumors exhibit an MSI phenotype. This conclusion is in agreement with the initial findings of Kong et al. [14] for the influence of this variant in HNPCC kindreds, since MSI phenotype is present in almost all tumors of patients with this condition [17]. The most likely explanation for these findings is that units of the cyclin D1 regulated cell cycle control system are frequently inactivated by the MSI phenotype, thus potentiating the proliferative activity of the aberrant CCND1 protein produced from the A allele. However, such an association was not found by McKay et al. [11] and by Bala et al. [15], which further potentiates the complexity of the genetic predisposition for the development of colorectal cancer.
Table 1. Allelic frequencies and genotype distribution of the G870A polymorphism in the CCND1 gene in colorectal cancer patients and control subjects.
|
Patients
(n = 167) |
Control
Subjects
(n = 173) |
p |
Alleles
• A
• G |
0.54 (54.0)
0.46 (46.0) |
0.51 (51%)
0.49 (49%) |
0.47 |
Genotypes
• AA
• AG
• GG |
53 (32%)
73 (44%)
41 (21%) |
43 (25%)
88 (51%)
42 (24%) |
0.47 |
Table 2. Alellic frequencies and genotype distribution of the G870A polymorphism in the CCND1 gene in colorectal cancer patients less than 60 years of age in relation to the MSI status of their tumors.
|
MSI
Tumors
(n = 9) |
MSS
TumorsÎ
(n = 47) |
p |
Alleles
• A
• G |
0.83 (83%)
0.17 (17%) |
0.48 (48%)
0.52 (52%) |
0.005 |
Genotypes
• AA
• AG
• GG |
6 (67%)
3 (33%)
0 (0%) |
14 (30%)
17 (36%)
16 (34%) |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|