
PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY
OF 17Q12 MICRODELETION SYNDROME –
THREE CASES AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE Țuțulan-Cuniță A, Pavel AG, Dimos L, Nedelea M,
Ursuleanu A, Neacșu AT, Budișteanu M, Stambouli D *Corresponding Author: Andreea Țuțulan-Cuniță, Cytogenomic Medical Laboratory, 35 Calea Floreasca,
Bucharest, 14453, Romania, Tel: 0040212331354, Fax: 0040212331357, E-mail: cunita@cytogenomic.ro page: 0
|
INTRODUCTION
Chromosome 17q12 microdeletion syndrome (MIM
614527) is a contiguous gene deletion syndrome caused by
a 1-2.5 Mb loss [1, 2, 3], with a widely variable phenotype
ranging from prenatal multicystic dysplastic kidneys or
other urinary system anomalies to postnatal pancreatic
disfunction (maturity onset diabetes of the young type 5
– MODY5) in approx. 40% of patients, or neurodevelopmental
disorder (mild to moderate intellectual disability,
speech delay, autistic features, schizophrenia, rarely epilepsy)
in approx. 50% of patients [1, 3]. Facial dysmorphisms
(frontal bossing, malar flattening, micrognathia,
retrognathia, downslanting palpebral fissures, depressed
nasal bridge) have been described, as well as pancreatic
atrophy, liver abnormalities, genital anomalies in both
sexes or Mullerian dysplasia or aplasia in females, transient
neonatal hypercalcemia, and neonatal cholestasis [1-2,
4-7]. The same genetic defect has been associated with
Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser syndrome, suggesting
the existence of a continuous spectrum of phenotypes associated
with 17q12 microdeletion [5]. However, to date,
no correlation between the deletion size and gene content
and clinical phenotype has been established. Moreover,
patients with similar phenotypes were reported, carrying
mutations in HFN1B gene [1].
Deletion of 17q12 is incompletely penetrant and
its expressivity is highly variable, ranging from severe
anomalies, leading to kidney failure before birth, to mild
or no problems at all. While 70% of deletions occur de
novo, instances where the deletion was inherited from an
asymptomatic parent have been reported [6].
The critical region at 17q12 is flanked by polymorphic
segmental duplications and contains at least 15 genes,
out of which HFN1B and LHX1 are hypothesized to be essential for renal function, neuropsychiatric conditions,
and female genital anomalies [2, 8]. Many of the remaining
genes, such as CCL and TBC1D, have multiple copies as
normal population variants and are not likely to be dosage
sensitive. Reciprocal duplications are associated with
intellectual disability and epilepsy, though asymptomatic
individuals have also been described [1].
While the overall prevalence of 17q12 deletion syndrome
is unknown, a Danish study estimated its country
prevalence as 1.6:1,000,000 [7]. Wan et al. (2019) [9]
found that 4.2% of fetuses carried a 17q12 deletions spanning
between 1.42-1.58 Mb in a cohort of 126 pregnancies
with renal anomalies detected by ultrasound.
In this article, we present 3 new cases of 17q12 deletions
and review a large number of the reports, covering 92
patients with this genetic anomaly. Patients were selected
based on their renal disorder phenotype or, if asymptomatic
and carrying the deletion, the presence of a renal phenotype
in a first degree relative. Patients with a primary diagnosis
of Mullerian dysplasia or aplasia, Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-
Hauser syndrome or only MODY5 were not included
in the current study. However, given the complexity and
the wide variability of the phenotype, from asymptomatic
to lethal, the genetic counseling is therefore difficult and
conversations about the implications of 17q12 microdeletion
must continue.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|