
JANUS KINASE V617F MUTATION DETECTION
IN PATIENTS WITH MYELOFIBROSIS Nikolova D1,2,*, Yordanov A2, Damyanova V1,2, Radinov A2, Toncheva D1 *Corresponding Author: Dragomira Nikolova, Ph.D., Department of Medical Genetics, Medical Faculty,
Medical University Sofia, 2 Zdrave Street, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria. Tel: +359888-103-456,
E-mail: dmb@abv.bg page: 57
|
RESULTS
Two hundred and thirty-two patients with chronic
myeloproliferative neoplasms have been genotyped for
their JAK2 V617F genotypic status. Eighty-two of 232
patients (35.4%) were diagnosed with ET, 35/232 (15.1%)
PV/EV, 38/232 (16.4%) MF/OMF (osteomyelofibrosis),
70/232 (30.1%) chromic MPN and 7/232 (3.0%) with other
hematological diseases (Figure 1). We performed analysis
of the bone marrow biopsy samples of patients with MF/
OMF (38 individuals) and in 20 of them (52.6%) the initial
diagnosis was confirmed. In six patients, the diagnosis
was rejected based on the negative result of the biopsy
sample (15.8%), five patients eventually proved to carry
ET (13.2%), six had PV (15.8%) and one had MPN (2.6%).
The mean age of the patients in our study was 62 years
(29-94 years), there was an equal distribution men:women
(10 vs. 10) (Table 1). According to the JAK2 genotype status:
8/20 (40.0%) were homozygous with the wild type allele
(NN) (men:women = 3:5); 9/20 (45.0%) were heterozygous
(MN) (men:women = 6:3) and 3/20 (15.0%) were homozygous
with the mutated allele (MM) (men:women = 1:2).
Overall, in 20 patients with MF, proven by trepanobiopsy,
12 (60.0%) (group 1) carried the mutant allele and
eight (40.0%) (group 2) did not. The mean age of patients
from group 1 was 61.4 years; men:women ratio was 7:5.
Patients in group 2 showed similar characteristics (mean
age 62.4 years; men:women ratio was 3:5).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|