
A NOVEL DE NOVO PARACENTRIC INVERSION
[inv(20)(q13.1q13.3)] ACCOMPANIED BY AN 11q14.3-q21
MICRODELETION IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT
WITH AN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY Zachaki S, Kouvidi E, Mitrakos A, Lazaros L, Pantou A, Mavrou A, Tzetis M, Manola KN *Corresponding Author: Dr. Sophia Zachaki, Genesis Genoma Lab, Kifisias Avenue 302, Chalandri,
15232, Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30-210-6803130. Fax: +30-210-6894778. E-mail: szachaki@genlab.gr page: 63
|
METHODS AND RESULTS
Cytogenetic analysis of the boy and his parents was
performed on G-banded chromosome preparations at high
resolution level (>550 bphs) from PHA (phytohemagglutinin)-
stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes. Imaging
and karyotyping were achieved via microscopy and
computer imaging techniques. For each individual, 25
metaphases were fully analyzed and karyotypes were described
according to the International System for Human
Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) 2016 [6]. Karyotypic
analysis showed that the boy was a carrier of a PAI of chromosome
20, with breakpoints at q13.1 and q13.3 chromosomal
regions in all metaphases analyzed [46,XY, inv(20)
(q13.1q13.3)] (Figure 1), confirming the prenatal karyotype.
Karyotypes of both parents were normal indicating
that inv(20) was a de novo chromosomal abnormality in
the child. Written informed consent was obtained from
the patient’s mother for publication of this case report and
accompanying images.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) performed
on peripheral blood of the boy using whole chromosome
paint for chromosome 20 (Vysis, Abbott Laboratories, Lake
Bluff, IL, USA) revealed a normal hybridization pattern.
Therefore, the karyotype was defined as 46,XY,inv(20)
(q13.1q13.3).ishinv(20)(q13.1q13.3) (wcp20+) de novo.
Molecular karyotyping was also performed in order
to identify possible submicroscopic unbalanced chromosomal
aberrations not detectable by G-banded chromosomal
analysis. The G3 4x180k CGH+SNP (single
nucleotide polymorphism) microarray platform with an average probe spacing of 13 kb (Agilent Technologies,
Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used. Samples were processed
according to manufacturer’s instructions and CytoGenomics
4.1 software (Agilent Technologies) was used for feature
extraction and visualization of the resulting data. For
annotation of genes in the deleted or duplicated genomic
segments the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC)
Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/), the Database
of Genomic Variants (http://projects.tcag.ca/variation/; human
genome build 19) and DECIPHER (https://decipher.
sanger.ac.uk/) databases, were used.
Array comparative genome hybridization revealed
a 100 kb microdeletion in the inverted segment at the
20q13.12 region, which is considered a copy number polymorphism.
In addition, an interstitial deletion of 1.97 Mb at
the chromosomal region 20q12 (20:38157428-40128669)
was revealed, distal from the inverted segment that included
11 genes (Table 1), among which is the MAFB
OMIM morbid gene. Interestingly, another deletion of 4.5
Mb was detected at chromosomal region 11q14.3-11q21
(11:89545468-94077250, hg19) containing 36 genes of
uncertain clinical significance (Figure 2). Detected relevant
microduplications and microdeletions are presented
in Table 1.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|