
THE FREQUENCY OF EGFR AND KRAS MUTATIONS IN THE
TURKISH POPULATION WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG
CANCER AND THEIR RESPONSE TO ERLOTINIB THERAPY Demiray A, Yaren A, Karagenç N, Bir F, Demiray AG,
Karagür ER, Tokgün O, Elmas L, Akça H, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-0184. *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Hakan Akça, Cancer Research Center, Pamukkale University,
11 University Street, Denizli Turkey. E-mail: hakca@pau.edu.tr (primary), hakanakca@yahoo.com page: 21
|
RESULTS
Patient Profiles. We conducted this study on paraffin-
embedded tissues of 300 consecutive patients with
NSCLC from January 2010 through January 2014. In the
300 patients with NSCLC, 230 (76.7%) patients had advanced
disease, 62 (20.7%) of these patients were female,
238 (79.3%) were male. Histopathologically, there were
62 squamous and 228 adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients.
The median age of the patients was 62 (range 37-82), 233
(74.3%) had a history of smoking. The patient characteristics
are summarized in Table 1.
EGFR Mutations Profiles. We detected EGFR mutations
in 97 patients out of 300 patients, 30 of which were
female and 67 were male patients. Histopathologically,
13 were squamous type 77 adenocarcinoma, while seven
were in other subtypes. In terms of age, 50 patients were
over 62 years old, 47 patients were less than 62, and 59
of them are smokers. The EGFR mutations were found
to be statistically significant in females, non smokers and
adenocarcinoma patients. Eighteen patients were in early
stages (I-IIIA), while 79 patients were in advanced stages
(IIIB-IV), considering progression [9] (Table 2). We detected
53.5% EGFR mutations in exon 19 [Table 3(A)]. KRAS Mutation Profiles. Seventy-five of 300 patients
have KRAS mutations, 12 of which were females,
63 were males. Histopathologically, 18 patients have squamous
type NSCLC, while 55 have adenocarcinoma and
two were in other subtypes. Thirty-two patients were older
than 62 and 58 patients were smokers. Sixteen patients
were in early stages and 59 patients were in advanced
stages of cancer (Table 2). We found no statistically significant
differences between KRAS mutations and age,
gender, smoking, stage of the cancer.
We detected both EGFR-KRAS mutations in 20
patients, four females and 16 male patients. Histopathologically,
two of them were squamous, 16 were adenocarcinoma
and two were in other types. Two were in early
stage, 18 were in advanced stages, 13 of them were older
than 62. Eleven of them are smokers, while nine are not.
Detailed information is given in Table 2.
Survival Rates of Patients with EGFR-KRAS
Mutations. Fifty-nine patients who had either EGFR
mutations or both EGFR and KRAS mutations, received
erlotinib therapy. We showed that survival rates of patients
who received EGFR-TKI therapy was significantly higher
than patients with EGFR mutations who did not receive
erlotinib therapy [Figure 1(A) and 1(B)].
Twenty patients who have EGFR-KRAS mutations
and were not treated with erlotinib, had the lowest survival
rate (34 ± 16 weeks) (p 0.0007) [Figure 2(B)]. Patients
with both mutations and who received erlotinib therapy,
had a survival rate of 98 ± 16 weeks [Figure 2(B)]. Patients
who had only the EGFR mutation and were treated with
erlotinib, had a survival rate of 161 ± 30 weeks [Figure
2(A)], and those who did not receive erlotinib therapy, had
a survival rate of 90 ± 13 weeks [Figure 2(A)].
The overall survival rate patients treated with EGFRTKI
without progression was also found to be significantly
higher. Patients who were treated with EGFR-TKI: 288 ±
11 and those who were not: 119 ± 11 weeks (p 0.004) [Figure
1(A)]. Overall survival rates were 126 ± 11 in patients
with EGFR mutations and 121 ± 9 weeks in other patients
(p 0.266) [Figure 1(B)]. We observed, that patients who have both EGFR and KRAS mutations, have the lowest
overall survival rate and erlotinib therapy increased the
survival rate in patients who have both mutations, while
progression-free survival rates in patients treated with erlotinib
were 32 ± 5 weeks, these rates were 33 ± 3 weeks
in patients who were not treated with erlotinib (p 0.755).
KRAS mutation 100 ± 4, without mutation 131 ± 11 weeks,
p 0.038, and without a progression survival rate was not
statistically significant (KRAS mutations 31 ± 5, without
KRAS mutation 33 ± 3 weeks, p 0.0807).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|