
GENE MAPPING IN AN ANOPHTHALMIC PEDIGREE
OF A CONSANGUINEOUS PAKISTANI FAMILY
OPENED NEW HORIZONS FOR RESEARCH Saleha S, Ajmal M, Zafar S, Hameed A *Corresponding Author: Dr. Shamim Saleha, Department of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Kohat
University of Science and Technology, Kohat 26000, Khyber Paktunkhwa, Pakistan. Tel: +92-922-5291-4659.
Cell: +92-333-964-2532. Fax: +92-922-554-556. E-mail: shamimsaleha@yahoo.com page: 77
|
INTRODUCTION
Clinical anophthalmia is a rare genetic disease of
the eye and phenotype refers to the absence of ocular
tissue in the orbit of eye [1-3]. Congenital clinical anophthalmia
is commonly bilateral [4] but it may also
be unilateral [5]. Often anophthalmia is part of a syndrome
and is accompanied by other brain anomalies
[6,7]. Clinically, in the absence of apparent ocular tissue,
congenital anophthalmia and extreme microphthalmia
(A/M), i.e., the presence of a small eye, are
considered the same, because computerized tomography
(CT) scan investigations indicated residual neuroectoderm
in the orbit of the eye in some cases [8].
Clinical anophthalmia exhibits different patterns
of genetic inheritance, i.e. autosomal dominant,
autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive
[4,9]. Studies on autosomal recessive mode of inheritance
of anophthalmia have rarely been reported
[1,10]. Similarly, previous research studies have
also provided rare evidence about consanguinity association
with congenital anophthalmia [8,11].
Anophthalmia/microphthalmia cause a considerable
percentage of congenital visual impairments in children [12]. Epidemiological data has reported
that the prevalence of congenital anophthalmia
is three in 100,000. However, other evidence
estimated the combined prevalence of congenital
anophthalmia and microphthalmia up to three in
100,000 [13,14]. In developed countries, a prevalence
of 0.2-0.4 per 10,000 births has been reported
[15-17]. Epidemiological studies have also investigated
some risk factors for anophthalmia including
late maternal age, multiple births [15,16], low birth
weight and premature birth complications [18]. Epidemiological
studies have reported that both genetic
and environmental factors cause anophthalmia and
microphthalmia, however, environmental factors
account for a lesser number of cases [4].
Genetic linkage analysis studies have identified
the same loci and mutations in the same genes for
both clinical anophthalmia and extreme microphthalmia
[4]. It was considered that congenital A/M
showed genetic heterogeneity due to linkage of a
large number of loci with them. Similarly, mutations
in several well-defined human genes such as
CHX10, RAX, SOX2 and OTX2, are also associated
with heritable forms of clinical anophthalmia and
severe microphthalmia [9].
In the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region of Pakistan,
different Pashtoon tribes are prominent ethnic groups
and due to cultural impacts, they have very strong
reservations regarding marriages outside their tribal
boundaries, as they believe that dilution of tribal
blood may result in losing their specific tribal characteristics.
Moreover, they practice consanguineous
marriages to strengthen family ties and to maintain
the family structure and property [19]. The causes
of congenital inherited diseases in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
are maternal illiteracy, mother’s age to be
less than 20 years at the birth of first child, birth interval
of less than 18 months [20], and the influencing
culture factor to have more children, particularly
sons, until menopause. The lack of public awareness
toward prenatal diagnosis or prevention of inherited
disease and health risks associated with consanguineous
unions, is limited. Many people do not
agree with medical explanations of a genetic mode
of disease inheritance, even in case where there is
an affected child. Because of this, inherited diseases
are frequently observed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
that follow Mendelian patterns of inheritance, and
the molecular bases are not known. In present study,
a consanguineous Pakistani family of the Pashtoon
ethnic group with isolated clinical anophthalmia in
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was investigated.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|