
GENETIC AND CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF
NONSYNDROMIC HEARING IMPAIRMENT
IN PEDIATRIC AND ADULT CASES Xing J, Liu X, Tian Y, Tan J, Zhao H *Corresponding Author: Mr. Xinguo Liu, Ear, Nose and Throat Department, The Central Hospital of
Zhumadian, No. 747, Zhonghua Road, Zhumadian City, Henan Province, People’s Republic of China,
463000. Tel: +86-396-292-6205. Fax: +86-396-272-6530. E-mail: xingglsci@163.com page: 35
|
RESULTS
In the 263 patients with NSHI, a total of 20
types of sequence changes were detected. These
included 15 published mutations in GenBank, of
which 10 were known pathogenic mutations (G4D,
R32C, 35delG, E47X, W77X, 176-191del16, Q80R,
235delC, S139N and 299-300 delAT), five were
previously described polymorphisms (T18I, T86R,
G160S, Y38C and 50N) and five were novel sequence
variations located in a highly conserved region. Table
1 lists the variations and number of affected alleles.
Rates of Pathological Mutations in Individuals
with NSHI. Of the 263 NSHI patients, 49
(18.6%) exhibited a GJB2 gene mutation: 29 cases
were homozygous for a mutation, eight had compound
heterozygous mutations and 12 had a single
heterozygous mutation (Table 2). The types of mutation
included 235delC, 176del6bp, 512insAACG,
and 299delAT; 235delC was the most common type
of GJB2 gene mutation, occurring in a total of 42
cases, 30 of whom were homozygous and the other
12 were heterozygous. Thirty patients (11.4%) carried
mtDNA mutations; 28 cases had the C1494T
mutation and two cases had the A1555G mutation.
Mutation Status Differs with Age of Patient at
First Hospital Visit. Patients were categorized by age
at the ENT Department visit (Figure 1, Table 3), resulting
in 67 adults and 196 pediatric cases (72 infants, 54
preschool cases, and 70 school-age cases). The GJB2
gene mutations were detected in 5.97% adults and
22.96% pediatric cases; this difference was statistically
significant (χ2 = 9.506, p = 0.002). In contrast, mtDNA
A1555G/C1494T mutations were detected in 31.34%
adults and 4.59% pediatric cases; this difference was
also statistically significant (χ2 = 35.359, p <0.001).
Within the pediatric group, the distributions of both GJB2 gene and mtDNA mutations among the subcategories
were statistically similar (each p value >0.05).
Mutation Status Differs with Age of Onset of
Deafness. Patients were divided by age of onset of
NSHI, resulting in 26 adult cases and 237 pediatric
cases (186 infants, 21 preschool cases, and 30 schoolage
cases) (Figure 2, Table 4). The GJB2 gene mutations
were not detected in any of the adult-onset cases, but were present in 20.68% of pediatric cases; this
difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). In
contrast, mtDNA A1555G/C1494T mutations were
detected in 15.38% of adult-onset patients and 8.86%
of pediatric cases; this difference was not statis-tically
significant (p = 0.288). Differences in mutation distributions
in the pediatric subcategories were not statistically
significant for either the GJB2 gene or mtDNA
A1555G/C1494T mutations (each p value >0.05).
For the pediatric cases, hearing loss was further
classified as either pre-lingual or post-lingual (Table
5). The difference in GJB2 gene mutation between
these two groups was statistically significant (χ2 =
4.683, p = 0.031); in contrast, the difference in mtDNA
A1555G/C1494T mutations between these groups
was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.695, p = 0.404).
Age Distributions Differ Between NSHI Patients
with GJB2 Gene Mutations and Those with
mtDNA Mutations. Patients who were positive for any
mutation were subdivided into three age categories by
mutation status and age of onset (Table 6). Patients with
the GJB2 gene mutation primarily experienced onset
within the first year of life (65.31%). Those with mtDNA
A1555G/ C1494T mutations were nearly evenly
divided between the three onset age groups. However,
the difference in onset age distributions between those
with GJB2 gene mutations and those with mtDNA
mutations was statistically significant (p <0.05).
Hearing Loss Phenotypes Differ by Mutation
Status. Finally, patients were categorized according
to their hearing loss phenotypes and mutation status.
Patients with mtDNA A1555G/C1494T mutations
generally exhibited mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
In contrast, most patients with GJB2 gene mutations
exhibited profound hearing loss. This difference in
phenotypic distributions was statistically significant
(p <0.05) (Table 7). Of the 30 patients with mtDNA
A1555G/C1494T mutations, 22 underwent complete
PTA. Severity of hearing loss was again judged according
to the multiple grading standards: published
recommendations [11], ISO-1964 criteria, and ISO-
1997 criteria, as well as the mean hearing thresholds at 0.25-8.0 kHz (full frequency band), 1.0-4.0 kHz
and 4.0-8.0 kHz (Table 8). The difference between
hearing loss judged according to the ISO-1964 criteria
and the one judged according to the mean hearing
threshold at 4.0-8.0 kHz, was statistically significant
(p <0.001); however, the differences between hearing
loss judged according to the mean hearing threshold at
4.0-8.0 kHz and the one according to the other criteria
were not statistically significant (each p value >0.05).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|