
VON HIPPEL-LINDAU DISEASE: THE CLINICAL
MANIFESTATIONS AND GENETIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
OF TWO CASES FROM A SINGLE FAMILY Kinyas S1, Ozal SA1,*, Guclu H1, Gurlu V1, Esgin H1, Gurkan H2 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Sadık Altan Ozal, Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim
Dalı, Edirne 22030, Turkey. Tel: +90-505-450-42-67. Fax: +90-284-223-55-06. E-mail: altanozal@hotmail.com page: 65
|
CASE REPORT
Case 1. A 29-year-old male patient was referred
to the retina department. About 1 month previously,
percutaneous radiofrequency ablation treatment was
performed on the patient due to RCC in his left kidney
(Figure 1). Central nervous system involvement was
not detected in the patient.
On ophthalmological examination, best-corrected
visual acuity (BCVA) was counting fingers from 2
meters in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye on the
Snellen acuity visual chart. Vitritis was detected in
the right eye on slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The fundus
examination revealed an extensive lipid exudation on
the fovea and macula, and a 3-4 optic disc diametersized
RH at the equator in the right eye; it was normal
in the left eye. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA)
showed that the RH in the right eye was responsible
for fluorescein staining on the feeding artery and
drainage vein and fluorescein leakage. Optical coherence
tomography (OCT) showed that there was a
foveal detachment in the right eye (Figure 2).
The patient’s blood sample was collected in vacutainers
containing EDTA as anticoagulant. After
DNA extraction (EZ1 Advanced Instruments; Qiagen,
Hilden, Germany), mutation analysis of the VHL gene
(NG_008212.3, NM_000551) was performed using
Sanger sequencing with the ABI PRISM™ 3130 Avant
system (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY, USA).
The entire coding region and the exon/intron boundaries
of the VHL gene (transcript ENST00000256474)
were sequenced. The amplicon panel primers and conditions
used were established in the laboratory.
A heterozygous missense mutation c.202T>C,
(p.Ser 68Pro) in exon 1 of the VHL gene was found
in the pa-tient’s DNA sample (Figure 3). This mutation
is reported in the HGMD-PUBLIC (CM073416)
(http://www.hgmd. org).
The pathogenicity of the variation was tested in
the Polyphen database and it was scored as probably
damaging [probably damaging with a score of 0.960
(sensitivity: 0.78; specificity: 0.95)]. However, this
variation was not listed the in the Exac database.
Case 2. A 33-year-old male patient (who is the first
cousin of Case 1) was referred to the retina department.
He was operated on because of a CNS hemangioblastoma
3 years earlier (Figure 4). The patient stated that
he had vision loss in his left eye after the CNS operation.
About 2 weeks earlier, a partial right nephrectomy
operation was performed due to RCC (Figure 5).
Best-corrected visual acuity was 1.0 on the
Snellen acuity chart in the right eye and no light perception
in the left eye. Biomicroscopic examination
was normal in both eyes. The fundus examination
revealed optic nerve atrophy and two RH at the equator
in the left eye, and was normal in the right eye.
Fundus fluorescein angiography showed that hyperfluorescence
and fluorescein leakage was caused by
the lesions. Hyper reflectance was observed under
the cross-section of the RH, and the macular section
was normal in OCT (Figure 6). The same mutation
as in Case 1 was also detected in the genetic analysis
(c.202T>C, p.Ser 68Pro).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|