
THE INCIDENCE AND TYPE OF CHROMOSOMAL
TRANSLOCATIONS FROM PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
OF 3800 PATIENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Vasilevska M1,*, Ivanovska E1, Kubelka Sabit K1, Sukarova-Angelovska E2, Dimeska G3 *Corresponding Author: Marinela Vasilevska, M.Sc., Department of Diagnostic Laboratories, Clinical Hospital
Acibadem-Sistine, Skupi 5A, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3099-511; Fax: +389-2-
3099-599; vasilevskam@acibademsistina.com.mk page: 23
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
During the period from 2002 to 2012, 3800
prenatal samples [2556 amniotic fluids and 1244
chorionic villus samples (CVS)] were referred to
the Department of Diagnostic Laboratories (Cytogenetic
Laboratory), Clinical Hospital Acibadem
Sistina, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia (ROM). Referral
reasons for prenatal diagnosis were advanced
maternal age, abnormal ultrasound findings, history
of chromosomal abnormalities, positive maternal serum
triple test (Table 1).
Amniotic fluid samples and CVS were cultivated
in Amniogrow complete medium (Cytogen, Sinn,
Germany). Peripheral blood samples of the parents
(prenatal detection of structural chromosomal abnormality)
were cultivated in Lymphogrow medium
(Cytogen). At least 15 metaphases were analyzed for
each case and 10 metaphases were karyotyped using
Bandview software from Applied Spectral Imaging
(Carlsbad, CA, USA). The results were reported according
to the recommendations of the International
System for Chromosome Nomenclature 2009 [3].
RESULTS
During 10 years prenatal diagnosis and 3800
samples provided by amniocentesis and chorion biopsy,
we detected seven Robertsonian translocations,
eight autosomal reciprocal translocations and one sex
chromosome translocation in balanced and unbalanced
states (Table 2). Referral reasons for prenatal
diagnosis for all cases are represented in Table 1.
An overall frequency of all Robertsonian transloca-
tions was 0.18%; all four (13;14) were in balanced
state, three of which originated from maternal
Robertonian translocations and only one case of paternal
origin. Maternal carriers of this Robertsonian
translocation did not have reproductive problems or
pregnancies with unbalanced rob(13;14) translocations.
The translocation with paternal origin resulted
from oligoastenoteratozoospermia in the paternal
carrier of rob(13;14) and conception was achieved
after applying techniques of assisted reproduction.
There were two rob(14;21) translocations detected
in an unbalanced state, both of them of maternal origin.
In one of the patients with familial rob(14;21)
the microscopic analysis of the curetted placental
tissue showed abnormalities that suggested chromosomal
abnormalities consistent with trisomy. The
chorionic villi had irregular villus contours (shapes)
with mucinous or edematous stroma (Figure 1). The
villous blood vessels were diminished and nucleated
erythrocytes were absent. The trophoblast on the villous
surface showed trophoblastic proliferations in
the form of sprouts (Figure 2).There is one case with
de novo 46,XY, +13,der(13;13) with detected ultrasound
abnormalities. The autopsy of the fetus showed multiple anomalies. The fetus had cheilognathopalatoshisis,
hexadactily on both toes. The visceral organs
did not show any abnormalities. These findings
were consistent with a Patau’s syndrome phenotype.
The frequency of autosomal reciprocal translocations
was 0.21% (eight cases). Five conceptions
with reciprocal translocations of autosome chromosomes
in a balanced state (paternal origin) were
achieved normally. There was one double translocation
46,XX t(1;21)t(7;16) with normal ultrasound
parameters from maternal origin, mother was the de
novo carrier for both translocations, without phenotypic
abnormalities (Figure 3). There was only one
de novo 45,XY,t(18;21)(p11;q11),18p- case associated
with ultrasound abnormalities detected after a
pregnancy was achieved with the assistance of IVF.
One case, 45,X, t(2;21)(p10;p10) of unknown origin,
was represented with ultrasound hydrops fetalis that
was associated with Turner Syndrome phenotype.
There was one de novo case of apparently balanced
sex chromosome translocation [46,X,t(X;10)
(p11.23; q22.3)] in a single pregnancy achieved after
transfer of three thawed embryos (Figure 4). The
karyotypes of the parents were normal.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|