MOSAIC INTRACHROMOSOMAL TRIPLICATION OF (12)(p11.2p13) IN A PATIENT WITH PALLISTER-KILLIAN SYNDROME
Yakut S, Mıhcı E, Altiok Clark O, Cetin Z, Keser I, Berker S, Luleci G
*Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Guven Luleci, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Arapsuyu, Antalya, Turkey; Tel.: +90-242-249-69-70; Fax: + 90- 242-227-44-95; E-mail: luleci@akdeniz.edu.tr
page: 61

DISCUSSION

Intrachromosomal triplications are rare events and the middle segment usually being inverted in orientation, as in our case [8]. In the majority of cases, triplications were interstitial, whereas there is only one published report of triplication of a whole chromosome arm [9]. In most cases, triplications had originated from maternal chromosomes [13]. Our case is the second patient with intrachromosomal triplication of a whole chromosome arm. To the best of our knowledge, only two patients with intrachromosomal triplication of the short arm of chromosome 12 have been presented in the literature. In the article by Eckel et al. [8], the 12p11.22- p12.3 region was triplicated and this region does not cover the critical PKS region, which defi ned the chromosomal region 12pter-p12.3. Therefore, the patient’s clinical phenotype was similar to trisomy 12p syndrome rather than the PKS. Unexpectedly, the intrachromosomal triplication was found in all peripheral blood lymphocytes. Also, this intrachromosomal triplication was found in 12% of the mother’s peripheral blood lymphocytes. The clinical fi ndings were compatible with the PKS that were reported by Powis et al. [9]. During conventional cytogenetic analyses, triplicated chromosome 12 was observed in 30% of the cultured fi broblasts but not in peripheral blood lymphocytes. However, array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed a triplication of the 12p in the peripheral blood lymphocytes in a low level mosaicism. A parental transmission of the triplication could not be excluded since parental blood samples were not available [9]. However, this has been excluded in our patient because her parents’ karyotypes were normal. Mechanisms for the formation of the intrachromosomal triplication include; i) fusion of the inverted duplicated supernumerary marker chromosome with the normal homologue; ii) unequal crossover or interhomologue translocation followed by the inverted insertion at the former breakpoint junction; iii) two U-type exchanges among three chromatids [14-16]. Powis et al. [9] speculated that triplication of chromosome 12p could have arisen from telomere to telomere fusion of supernumerary analphoid isochromosome 12p with a normal chromosome 12. Indeed, there are three reports about PKS patients with analphoid inverted duplicated supernumerary marker chromosomes consisting of chromosome 12p [4,17-18]. The clinical fi ndings of the patient reported by Powis et al. [9] included hypotonia, brachycephaly with upslanting palpebral fi ssures, thin upper lip, low nasal bridge, high arched palate, a single transverse palmar crease on each hand and abnormal hair pattern. The clinical differences between this case and our case could result from differences in the degree of mosaicism and in the distribution of abnormal cells in different tissues. As a result, we report here the third patient with intrachromosomal triplication of the short arm of chromosome 12. We conclude that intrachromosomal triplication might be a new mechanism of formation for PKS.



Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006