
MOSAIC INTRACHROMOSOMAL TRIPLICATION
OF (12)(p11.2p13) IN A PATIENT WITH
PALLISTER-KILLIAN SYNDROME Yakut S, Mıhcı E, Altiok Clark O, Cetin Z, Keser I, Berker S, Luleci G *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Guven Luleci, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics,
School of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Arapsuyu, Antalya, Turkey; Tel.: +90-242-249-69-70; Fax: + 90-
242-227-44-95; E-mail: luleci@akdeniz.edu.tr page: 61
|
DISCUSSION
Intrachromosomal triplications are rare events
and the middle segment usually being inverted in
orientation, as in our case [8]. In the majority of
cases, triplications were interstitial, whereas there is
only one published report of triplication of a whole
chromosome arm [9]. In most cases, triplications had
originated from maternal chromosomes [13]. Our
case is the second patient with intrachromosomal
triplication of a whole chromosome arm.
To the best of our knowledge, only two patients
with intrachromosomal triplication of the short arm
of chromosome 12 have been presented in the literature.
In the article by Eckel et al. [8], the 12p11.22-
p12.3 region was triplicated and this region does
not cover the critical PKS region, which defi ned the
chromosomal region 12pter-p12.3. Therefore, the patient’s
clinical phenotype was similar to trisomy 12p
syndrome rather than the PKS. Unexpectedly, the
intrachromosomal triplication was found in all peripheral
blood lymphocytes. Also, this intrachromosomal
triplication was found in 12% of the mother’s
peripheral blood lymphocytes. The clinical fi ndings
were compatible with the PKS that were reported
by Powis et al. [9]. During conventional cytogenetic
analyses, triplicated chromosome 12 was observed in
30% of the cultured fi broblasts but not in peripheral
blood lymphocytes. However, array-based comparative
genomic hybridization analysis showed a triplication
of the 12p in the peripheral blood lymphocytes in a low level mosaicism. A parental transmission of
the triplication could not be excluded since parental
blood samples were not available [9]. However, this
has been excluded in our patient because her parents’
karyotypes were normal.
Mechanisms for the formation of the intrachromosomal
triplication include; i) fusion of the inverted
duplicated supernumerary marker chromosome with
the normal homologue; ii) unequal crossover or interhomologue
translocation followed by the inverted
insertion at the former breakpoint junction; iii) two
U-type exchanges among three chromatids [14-16].
Powis et al. [9] speculated that triplication of chromosome
12p could have arisen from telomere to telomere
fusion of supernumerary analphoid isochromosome
12p with a normal chromosome 12. Indeed, there
are three reports about PKS patients with analphoid
inverted duplicated supernumerary marker chromosomes
consisting of chromosome 12p [4,17-18].
The clinical fi ndings of the patient reported by
Powis et al. [9] included hypotonia, brachycephaly
with upslanting palpebral fi ssures, thin upper lip, low
nasal bridge, high arched palate, a single transverse
palmar crease on each hand and abnormal hair pattern.
The clinical differences between this case and
our case could result from differences in the degree of
mosaicism and in the distribution of abnormal cells in
different tissues.
As a result, we report here the third patient with
intrachromosomal triplication of the short arm of
chromosome 12. We conclude that intrachromosomal
triplication might be a new mechanism of formation
for PKS.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|