
CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR DATA ON
MENTAL RETARDATION IN BULGARIA Todorov T1#, Todorova A1#, Avdjieva D2, Dimova P3,
Angelova L4, Tincheva R2 and Mitev V1 *Corresponding Author: Tihomir Todorov, Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Sofia Medical University, 2 “Zdrave” str., Sofia 1431, Bulgaria; Tel./Fax: +359 29530715;
tisho.todorov@abv.bg page: 11
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The clinical data, genetic tests performed and
detected mutations are presented in Table 1 for FXS
patients, Table 2 for RTT patients and Table 3 for
PWS/AS patients.
FXS. Parents frequently stated that the disease
onset has been provoked by severe illnesses, such
as whooping cough, pneumonia, recurrent otitis.
Sometimes, parents have noticed that their child’s
development regressed after an infectious disease.
Karyotype analysis showed normal results in all
but patient 18 in whom the result was compatible
with FXS: 46,fra(X)(q27.3)Y[18]/46,XY[22].
The PCR protocol failed to detect a normal
fragment in three patients (9, 18 and 31 in Table 1),who were shown to have a hypermethylated CGG
pattern by MLPA analysis (Figure 1). Their mothers
showed single normal alleles and premutated
expanded alleles of ~70, ~90 and ~180 CGG repeats,
respectively (Figure 2) (the results were confirmed
by Southern blotting, data not shown). In patient 31,
a mosaic pattern normal/premutation/full mutation
was detected as a smear located from the zone of
normal fragments through the premutated zone to
full expansion detected as hypermethylation.
Patient 3 showed a normal allele along the CGG
repeated region, but this allele was three repeats
longer than the normal allele of his mother, who
also carried a premutation of about 90 repeats [10].
The hypermethylated MLPA profile of this patient
confirmed a mosaic genotype of full mutation/
normal allele [10]. These results were confirmed by
classical Southern blotting (data not shown).
The MLPA CNT did not show any deletion/
duplication on the FMR1 gene. In addition, the
MLPA probemix contains 14 specific probes for the
FMR2 gene (OMIM #300806), mutations which are
associated with fragile X MR E (FRAXE) (OMIM
#309584). Both FMR1 and FMR2 genes were
simultaneously analyzed by CNT and MT and no
pathological changes were detected on the FMR2
gene.
The remaining 28 FXS boys were subjected to
genetic tests on the ARX and MECP2 genes. The
reason is that mutations in the ARX gene have
been associated with MR and epilepsy [6,7], but
the results from a large series of screened patients
have been disappointing [16]. On the other hand,
mutations in the MECP2 gene can cause moderate
MR and obesity [17]. We detected no mutations in
the ARX gene or in the MECP2 gene.
RTT. Twenty-two of the mentally retarded
girls in this group were born after a complicated
pregnancy and delivery by Caesarean section.
Various vaccinations or severe infections were
reported by the parents as a triggering factor for
disease onset.
Karyotype analysis gave normal results in all
but patient 6 who carried a deletion of the short arm
of the X chromosome 46,XX,del(X)(p1.22).
Sequencing of the MECP2 gene revealed seven
mutations in this group (19.4%). Five different
types of substitutions were detected on exon 4 of
this gene: c.473C>T, p.Thr158Met; c.763C>T,
p.Arg255Stop; c.808C>T, p.Arg270Stop (found
in two girls); c.880C>T, p.Arg294 Stop, and
c.916C>T, p.Arg306Cys. A deletion of 44 bp was
also found by sequencing of exon 4 of this gene:
c.1157_1200 del44, p.Leu386fs. These mutations
have been reported in the MECP2 gene mutation
database [18].
The other 29 patients were subjected to the MLPA
analysis for large deletions of the MECP2, CDKL5
and ARX genes. Two large deletions, encompassing
exon 3 and a part of exon 4 (c.27-?_*?del) of the
MECP gene were detected in patients 23 and 35.
This deletion is available at the MECP2 mutation
database [18]. The MLPA profile is presented in
Figure 3. The deleted fragments were assessed
by the relative peak ratios, calculating the peak
area in comparison to the mean peak area of both
neighboring control peaks, and compared to the
control sample. The relative ratios obtained for the
probes in exon 3 and a part of exon 4 were <0.6,
which we interpreted as a deletion. The calculated
relative peak ratios are provided in the legend to
Figure 3.
We screened for mutations in the CDKL5 gene
in 27 patients without success. The PWS/AS as a
differential diagnosis in some of the patients (5, 14,
24, 25, 34 and 36) were also excluded.
PWS/AS. Karyotype analysis showed normal
results except in patient 17 in whom fluorescent in situ
hybridization analysis showed results compatible
with deletion: 46,XX,ishdel(15)(q11.2q11.2)
(D15S10x1),15p11.2 (D15Z1x2),15q22(PMLx2).
The methylation-specific PCR revealed that seven
patients lacked the paternal unmethylated fragment
(PWS) and that two patients lacked the maternal
methylated fragment (AS) (Figure 4). To determine
more precisely the mutation type (deletion or
UPD), we analyzed the nine genetically confirmed
cases by MS-MLPA and found six deletions and
three to have UPD (Figures 5A and 5B). The
calculated relative peak ratios in the deletion cases
were less than 0.6 and are presented in the legend
to Figure 5A.
Eight patients in this group remain with a
still unclear molecular defect. The suspected
diagnosis of FXS in the male patients was
excluded by analysis of the FMR1 gene. The
ARX gene was sequenced in the three PWS boys
and no mutations were detected. Patient 1 (Table 3) was additionally sequenced for mutations in
the MECP2 gene, but no pathological changes were
detected.
Altogether, we were able to clarify the molecular
basis in 22 of the 85 MR patients (26.0%), ~10.6%
of whom were PWS/AS, the same percentage
(~10.6%) were RTT and ~4.8 were FXS. The
percentage of the genetically proved diagnosis in
the group of FXS is relatively small (12.5%), which
might be due to the clinical criteria for patient
selection, including a number of autistic cases in
this group. The test for FXS is always the first step
in molecular diagnostics of boys with MR. It is
worth mentioning, that genetically proved diagnosis
among our RTT patients (25.0%) is relatively high
and all these cases are due to MECP2 mutations.
Despite of the type of mutation, all these cases are
very similar from a clinical point of view and well
recognized in Bulgaria.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|