
PP32. MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC STUDY OF LOW-LEVEL CHROMOSOMAL MOSAICISM IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM BY INTERPHASE FISH VORSANOVA S.G.1, 2, Iourov I.Y.1, 2, Voinova-Ulas V.Y.2, Gorbachevskaya N.L.1, Demidova I.A.1, 2, Beresheva A.K.1, 2, Monakhov V.V.1, Kravets V.S.2, Kolotii A.D.2, Yurov Y.B.1, 2.
1. National Research Center of Mental Health, RAMS, Moscow, Russia;
2. Institute of Pediatrics and Children Surgery, Roszdrav, Moscow, Russia.
e-mail: y_yurov@yahoo.com
*Corresponding Author: page: 61
|
Abstract
Cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic studies of individuals with autistic spectrum disorders indicate that 5-15% of them demonstrate chromosomal abnormalities that may be causative for these diseases. However, mosaic genetic alterations in autism remains to be studied. We have used interphase mFISH with chromosome enumeration DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, X and Y to determine the frequency of stochastic (or sporadic) aneuploidy and the presence of low level aneuploidy in lymphocytes in autistic patients and control group of non-autistic children. Through monitoring chromosome variations in a cohort of 24 individuals with autism and 18 matched controls we have detected that 8 cases of autism are characterized by low-level (4-12%) mosaic aneuploidy involving sex chromosomes (6 cases) and autosomes (2 cases). Since numerical chromosomal changes represent genome variations that affect whole gene set of a chromosome, it should be recognized that low-level chromosomal mosaicism could affect significantly development and functions of the brain without specific distinct clinical and phenotypic appearance. It is to note the difficulty to reveal mosaic chromosomal alterations by standard cytogenetic and molecular-genetic techniques without further application of molecular cytogenetics approaches. Our data suggest that interphase FISH is an adequate approach for identification of low-level chromosomal mosaicism in the diseased human somatic tissues. The work was supported by INTAS 03-51-4060 and RGRF (Russian Federation).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|