
PP22. THE USEFULNESS OF FISH-METHOD FOR DIAGNOSIS OF WILLIAMS-BEUREN SYNDROME N.G. GOROVENKO, E.G. Yevseenkova, T.E. Zerova - Lyubimova, L.P. Sheiko, N.A. Tishchenko, L.I. Brishevac
Department of Medical Genetics, National Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education named after P.L.Shupyk. Ministry of Public Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
e-mail: svpodolskaya@mail.ru
*Corresponding Author: page: 57
|
Abstract
Williams- Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a segmental aneusomy syndrome that results from a heterozygous deletion of contiguous genes at 7q11.23. WBS is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder with phenotypical variability. WBS is characterized by distinct facial changes, hyperacusis, mental retardation and congenital heart defect (particularly supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS). While WBS is the result of deletion of ELN, LIMK1 and 21 contiguous genes, point mutations within the elastin gene result in autosomal dominant disorders - supravalvular aortic stenosis. A pilot study has been carried out to assess the reliability of the detection of deletion at the elastin locus by conventional chromosome analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis as diagnostic tests in classical, suspected and atypical WBS patients with SVAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report clinical evaluation, cytogenetics analysis, FISH-investigations were held for 23 patients referred to test for WBS. For FISH- analysis we used LSI Williams Region (DNA Probe ELN, LIMK SO/D7S486.D7S522SG (VYSIS). RESULT: From 23 cases studied by FISH, 18 showed the microdeletion of the critical region. No deletion was demonstrated in another 3 patients in whom an earlier clinical diagnosis of WBS was judged doubtful and 2 patients with isolated SVAS. Conclusions: The FISH analysis is very informative for diagnostic values. Children with developmental retardation and WBS dysmorphic signs and with SVAS/PS heart defect should be examined by a cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic FISH analysis. This study confirms the usefulness of genetic studies as a diagnostic tool for Williams - Beuren syndrome.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|